0x32d1a53f…d4f5sent to0x6f3e6272…223d·#19,454,368·view on Etherscan
personally think this prop needs to make a much stronger case for this issuance idea.
afaict its really a reserve price by other means/
can look at sharkdao and lilnouns as case studies of why this may not give the results you are hoping for .
while illiquidity is a thing, you may find that while trying to hold out for your 1eth buyer demand goes the other direction and you lose the .75eth buyers that maybe you later wish you hadn't frozen out. Nouns is also experiencing this since v3 exit is also a sort of reserve price..
to the extent the dao would be implicitly funding implementation of this i think i am a no. do love the UNA wrapper and the regional focus.. i'm just stuck on the issuance piece which i think is not conducive to growing a fledgling community