0x05a1ff0a…011csent to0x6f3e6272…223d·#23,684,467·view on Etherscan
Sounds like a fun experiment that could take off. Appreciate that the team is offering some direct benefits to Nouns while building something that can benefit other communities as well and not rely solely on Nouns forever.
Worst case, we cross-pollinate with GLITCH, learn from the experiment, support web3 builders to develop an open-source onchain protocol, and are only down 5 ETH.
+1
> Keep Nouns Weird!
+1
> Voting FOR as I feel this aligns with the Nounish ethos. I appreciate the experimentation and willingness to push boundaries in NFT design and governance.
>
> That said, I do have some reservations. No shade to the artist, but I’m not convinced the current art is compelling enough to inspire the level of care/attachment this system depends on. Maybe the economic incentives will balance that out, but my first impression is that emotional engagement might fall short.
>
> On the revenue side... while I know Nouns isn’t primarily about profit, the proposal frames revenue as a benefit. In reality, any income to the DAO feels more like hope. It would require significant adoption, recurring engagement, and preference for Nounish traits before any meaningful flow of funds materialises.
>
> Still, the concept is interesting, the cost reasonable and the potential for novel insight high. Worth backing as an experiment 👍🏾