0xae65e700…46c0sent to0x6f3e6272…223d·#20,725,531·view on Etherscan
+1
> Excited to finally correct the backpack and fax errors. Thanks for making it possible dot!
>
> +1
>
> > @0xC7CC...7d87
> >
> > Thanks zebra.
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > Asking a voting majority to change purchased art on the buyer isn’t the way.
> > >
> > > Fix the mistaken art by artists in recent additions but leave alone the history.
> > >
> > >
> >
> > No super strong opinion here, but i think the first 3 (backpack, fax, film) are more clearly unintended mistakes that we should fix (and we've patched similar mistakes in the past).
> >
> > The text trait however is not as obviously a flaw (even if originally unintended) and i can see people being upset about this change.
+1
> @0xC7CC...7d87
>
> I could be mistaken but it doesn't seem trivial to only upgrade future nouns, I think you'd need a second art contract? Also, I think theres a valid framing where you consider a noun not as a static piece of art, but as something capable of changing. Imo this is cool but could see others disagreeing
>
> >
> >
> > Asking a voting majority to change purchased art on the buyer isn’t the way.
> >
> > Fix the mistaken art by artists in recent additions but leave alone the history.
> >
> >
>
> thanks dot