0xcc98cfdc…5159sent to0x50275e0b…e836·#18,706,737·view on Etherscan
If you believe that 'Code is Law' is legitimate, as LPs agreed to the smart contract terms, then Principles of International Commercial Contracts ought to apply. For a contract to be binding, there must be certain elements - one of which is "consideration". When you executed trades such that LPs receive zero value (zero consideration), the contract was no longer binding.
Further to that, a mistake (i.e., the rounding error) and the resulting "gross disparity" render a contract void as well. These are two examples of several such violations.
You understand this as your offer to rebate LPs is tacit admission.
If you’re a man of principle and integrity, you would recognize this and seek a resolution that is reasonable to all parties.