0xa8688227…9e63sent to0xf790a5f5…1365·#22,087,102·view on Etherscan
[draft]-$23k-usd-for-nft-folder-evolution-—-yea-or-nay@0xE260...F0fE
yes of course, but my argument is that, to pass a nouns prop, you are better of being able to name 5 people who loves the app vs vague gesturing at 'this could be for anyone'
find a niche audience first, scale later
> > people who would be interested in this app (the typical ABC collector?)
>
> viewing and appreciating art is universal, collecting is niche.
>
> nft folder is for viewing only, there are no price tags, no collecting, no social noise.
>
> this way, it could evolve into a tool for everyone and reach a broader audience through app store search or app store featuring if it goes really well.
>
> +1
>
> > @0xE260...F0fE
> >
> > i come back to "who is the audience for this, and do/will they use it?"
> >
> > i suspect the people who would be interested in this app (the typical ABC collector?) does not cleanly overlap with people in Nouns and Nouns gov, and it seems to me theres a gap to bridge where you have to bring some qualitative proof that there is an existing or potential user base
> >
> > generally speaking, i think nouns is prone to fund software where a) the voters are users and can clearly see the need or b) the voters are not the typical user, but the benefit for another audience is very clear and well defined -- i suspect this project falls somewhere in between, where voters are not the typical user, and also dont know who its for
> >
> > > nft folder is a cc0 browser for hi-res fine art.
> > >
> > > "if we are to get people appreciating nfts as art we should go for it"
> > >
> > > i’m looking for more public feedback on this draft, and you should try the app too.