0x008c8442…a7e4sent to0x6f3e6272…223d·#18,559,294·view on Etherscan
Absolutely not. This is inappropriate for Nouns DAO, there's no reason to "bail out" any DAO to begin with, but it's its own sovereign entity that can decide by its own governance and processes how to proceed.
But we should do the opposite and start pushing the RQ function up to 30% so that the arbing is more difficult and uncertain. They should RQ now if they want to sell their Nouns, the method they chose was not only a violation of their own governance and expectations around it (inappropriate use of the veto) that will leave a mark on their DAO and its claim of being "decentralized" but it also hurts Nouns DAO because 15 Nouns being on offer in the market gives any arber the control of when to create a fork and importantly when not to. She can now delay calling the fork and continue to "milk" the arb with little fear of the window closing because she can just instabuy enough Nouns to trigger it.
So no, Lil Nouns shouldn't be bailed out.