0xe10a136f…2b1esent to0x6f3e6272…223d·#21,430,831·view on Etherscan
+1
> The dao showed it doesn’t honestly care about minority protection by refusing to lower fork threshold before duna prop.
>
> As such, there’s no point in voting through this streaming change which is materially worse for the dao and only offers in return something we’ve seen few honestly care for (minority protection)
>
> Against
+1
> agree mostly with all the opinions shared here so far.. some of the thoughts in the back of my mind;
>
> - unsure about allowing exit in general. There is a secondary market for that.
>
> - not sure we should keep the nouns after exit, vs burn.
>
> - how does a stream / canceling a stream like this work tax-wise for nouns / auction winner if we ever reach non-profit status?
>
> +1
>
> > Supportive of a stream that is triggered if someone wins an auction at a level set by the Dao, many multiples above current win rate. Allowing these magic million donors a off-ramp while not grid locking the Dao in slow demand environment.
>
> +1
>
> > In favor of complying with DUNA, not in favor of minority protection via exit.
> >
> > +1
> >
> > > The dao showed it doesn’t honestly care about minority protection by refusing to lower fork threshold before duna prop.
> > >
> > > As such, there’s no point in voting through this streaming change which is materially worse for the dao and only offers in return something we’ve seen few honestly care for (minority protection)
> > >
> > > Against
> >
> > +1
> >
> > > The exit mechanic already functions through secondary sales, which are occurring almost daily.
> > >
> > > The fork threshold is currently at 100%. Ragequit was undeniably a mistake and can no longer happen. Any external attacks can be vetoed. So what are we doing here?
> > >
> > > Ideas like this feel like a significant waste of time and only introduce new attack vectors that this proposal fails to address.
> >
> > +1
> >
> > > Ive never been a strong proponent of this design (on the contrary been strongly against it in the past) but all-in-all i think this is a fine feature and net-positive compared to having no exit/refund mech.
> > >
> > > Thanks david/elad for all the hard work on this!
>
> +1
>
> > The dao showed it doesn’t honestly care about minority protection by refusing to lower fork threshold before duna prop.
> >
> > As such, there’s no point in voting through this streaming change which is materially worse for the dao and only offers in return something we’ve seen few honestly care for (minority protection)
> >
> > Against
>
> +1
>
> > This doesn't seem to protect any minorities. Is this necessary for establishing the DUNA?