0xa6c0f7bd…d756sent to0x6f3e6272…223d·#21,054,434·view on Etherscan
+1
> I think the voters want to see glitch more aligned with nouns if we're going to continue to fund the group as a nouns subculture. it doesn't necessarily have to be through branding imo, but through some form of participation in the dao (do we still say 'dao?' ...duna?). Vote signaling, sharing past work more with the community, creating something a bit more 'nouns focused' as a group to show the nouns community glitch is considering nouns aside from funding.
>
> p.s. love the glitch vibe and think this group is doing cool work so hope to see them consider voter feedback a bit and come back with another proposal in the future.
>
> +1
>
> > Skimming this, there's not one noggle or mention in any of the images. I had hopes that the original proposal would produce really creative uses of either the artwork or code (something like what Tigris is up to), but Nouns seems to be an afterthought for everyone involved. Artists are already using blockchains as a medium. Let's see how they can use Nouns as a medium.
>
> +1
>
> > After ready the prop a couple times and clicking into the propdate from last season, it doesn't make me very excited. There's no tie back to Nouns and from what I've seen, the last prop has been executed like any other sponsorship - just scrolling through the propdate I wouldn't be able to tell if this was funded by Nouns or Bayer.
> >
> > Here's an example - imo all of the "Funds" section read alike:
> > "Funds from the Nouns grant were used to cover the cost of travel, accommodation, and materials for creation of the artwork."
> >
> > More specific cornerstone feedback:
> > - The lack of overlap between GLITCH <> ⌐◨-◨ make it a very transactional sponsorship.
> > - The "Why Nouns?" section feels forced and doesn't seem to identify any existing synergies that could be leveraged to do greater, weirder things beyond Nouns ability to fund 60ETH of sponsorship.
> > - "Future involvement with Nouns:" after the 60ETH or during this phase? Why hasn't this happened already? the whole point of funding things is to add more people to the ⌐◨-◨ movement or at least make them aware of Nouns.
> > - Why ETH when all expenses are in USDC/fiat?
> > - This proposal reads a bit like Nouns is the first stop and if it's defeated, you'll move on to the next. Which makes sense, but also does not help make it compelling to support.
>
> +1
>
> > Im directionally aligned with this but I wish more media and relationships wouldve surfaced from the aftermath of the previous proposal.
> >
> > My problem sorts comes down to that i dont have an emotional connection to Glitch, and i dont know if (willpapper aside) the glitch team or participants/artists have an emotional connection back to nouns.
> >
> > I think this emotional tie (paired with fun media) is actually pretty important for nouns to justify large spends. In a way its about aligning with nouns values in spirit and community-building, not just in words (which is fairly easy for anyone to state).
>
> +1
>
> > Why ask for eth if budget is usdc?