0xa8688227…9e63sent to0xf790a5f5…1365·#22,236,913·view on Etherscan
things-worth-fixing@0x2897...c84F
yeah i feel pretty confident about the problems (including all the things you listed), less so about the antidotes
gut says high degree of automation is the end-game, but bearish on our ability to make sweeping leaps there, i think its gotta be gradual
> great write up. speaking to the governance side specifically:
>
> i'm pretty convinced that relying on large proposals as our grant-giving mechanism is fundamentally flawed. too much effort required from voters, can only pay a small # of builders, lots of back scratching/collusion, not enough accountability, people take votes personally, the list goes on.
>
> maybe ai can manage everyone's preferences as a delegate, but the experience as a builder would still be subpar. my hunch is trying to bandaid it with improvements won't change the core problem of exchanging very high effort from voters for medium signal funding.
>
> will do some more thinking today, but gut says skeuomorphic political mechanisms are not a good path. proposed solutions seem to add more complexity to an already confusing product for builders