0xae4705dc…5fedsent to0xf790a5f5…1365·#25,307,894·view on Etherscan
termination-of-secondary-duna-administration-services
yep and i voted against the original reserve admin proposal with 7 nouns... just wondering if anyone besides me had determined this, but if its just me thats cool too gl
+1
> @0xae47...5Fed
>
> Cool, I'm glad we agree on this point. Your input is much appreciated. Logically this means you too have determined that this is an unnecessary and inefficient use of the Nouns treasury. By whom? You ser.
>
> >
> >
> > no, but "it has been determined that maintaining a redundant administrative layer is unnecessary and represents an inefficient use of the Nouns DAO treasury."
> >
> > it has been determined by whom? the treasury would like names.
> >
> > +1
> >
> > > @0xae47...5Fed
> > >
> > > Do you honesty find that having a second DUNA admin is currently a benefit and not just a waste of money? I'd love to know your reasoning. We have basically 0 income at the moment. The admins are not so busy that 1 person could not handle the workload. This is all in the candidate. I think I explained my opinion well.
> > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > "it has been determined that maintaining a redundant administrative layer is unnecessary and represents an inefficient use of the Nouns DAO treasury."
> > > >
> > > > it has been determined by whom? the treasury would like names.
> > > >