0x32d1a53f…d4f5sent to0x6f3e6272…223d·#19,349,674·view on Etherscan
i LOVE retro. prop 63 was my attempt to do this in as trustless, open a way as conceivable and we tried to include literally anyone that cared about nouns as possible recipients *and* voters. however it does frustrate me that we are still resorting to multisigs and that a perpetual fully onchain retro funding engine *does not exist.* If it did I would push to activate it with as much dao eth as possible, ramping up to around 80-90% of our annual capital raise. i continue to feel this is the ideal funding strategy for Nouns; maximally decentralized/open and so the most conducive to unbounded scale. SO the model is totally up my alley and I agree frictionless/social ux is important ...but the off-chain stuff really is a drag I know the proposers are not indifferent to this, but I do think the prop should address how this particular attempt can be made admin-less (and really scale alignment-wise if it ultimately relies on farcaster sybil resistance). thusss Would be much more excited about a prop to fund building coordinape-like functionality (ie allocation proportional to votes received) -but with fully trustless voter onboarding- either into prop-house or as a standalone onchain backend for future farcaster activations or otherwise . i guess in my head since its already clear that this is probably the most powerful & culturally-aligned way we can spend, these multisig mvps feel like sort of pointless interim steps. Lets build the right infra and really legitimize retro at scale!