0xa31c2232…6020sent to0x8a907de4…0a2e·#18,245,022·view on Etherscan
I am voting yes to give GS a chance to deliver on their promises and with the caveat that GS will seek funding elsewhere in order to reduce the burden on the treasury for next quarter. I am of the opinion that this budget was too high and some of the reasoning "building out our new company" didn't sit well with me. I don't think building a company should be a burden of the DAO community treasury, especially if that company goes on to build other(non-Pooltogether) things after building an autonomous protocol.