0xca763232…3854sent to0x440d9d4e…5591·#19,910,287·view on Etherscan
While I am in support of this proposal and I'm one of the few community members who voted in favor of the original proposal on Snapshot. My decision to abstain is based on my duty as a delegate and well-meaning community member who wants to avoid setting an undesirable precedent. This is because the original terms of the proposal have changed concerning the amount being requested by the grantee. Granted the change is justifiable, but I think the correct process should be to submit a snapshot proposal to the DAO indicating the change in amount before making an onchain proposal. This safeguards against anyone making arbitrary changes to their proposals after it has been initially approved on Snapshot and submitting something different for onchain voting and citing this as an example if the outcome is unfavorable.