0x1c0aa8cc…5a20sent to0xe7aa6ca3…9853·#24,546,283·view on Etherscan
FWC is a general enough brand for a collector DAO. And the coin itself is pegged effectively to the value of one FW NFT atm. Simple goal to grow the membership, and the value of the collective (by increasing share of relative influence over TW), would be to mint more FW NFTs during remaining mint phase, on more or less, same terms as phase1. The secondary trading pool is not very liquid, but should converge to the value of the NFTs collected. But there could be a premium on the collective. I would like to propose a few onchain actions to consider (1) revoke the after-burner permit that was given to a smart contract set to burn any remainder left from sale phase1 (no longer relevant, untidy to have out there), (2) set an allowance to mint ~9mm more shares for 9 ETH to existing FW minion, which while collected during FW minting phase, will collect more FW NFTs. Any remainder would be ETH owned by the DAO, to do other NFT purchases, or whatever seems relevant going forward, including adding to existing FWC LP.