0x0081e6f9…0389sent to0xf790a5f5…1365·#25,727,864·view on Etherscan
@0xF6e7...6aA9
Thank you for the thoughtful feedback. I understand the concerns, and I appreciate the opportunity to clarify my intention.
Nouns Scooter is my attempt to take Nouns beyond the screen and into the real world — creating something people can actually see, ride, experience, and remember.
It is structured as a sustainable business so the project can continue operating without depending on Nouns funding forever, while 20% of net profit is committed back to Nouns.
I’m open to improving the transparency and reporting around that commitment. My goal is simple: to build something real, sustainable, and Nounish.
> TL;DR: This is a for-profit partnership whose benefits flow primarily to the proposer's own tourist business, with an unenforceable off-chain profit-share and no verified Noun ownership,…
>
> The scooter fleet is a commercial venture at a site the proposer co-owns, making the proposer both applicant and primary beneficiary — the direct, verifiable benefit to Nouns is a 20% profit-share that exists only as an off-chain promise with no onchain mechanism, failing I.7's requirement of both direct benefit and mission alignment (self-dealing concern under IV.3). Under I.8 a partner must verifiably own a Noun before approval, and no such ownership is shown, which is treated as unmet. The proposer's genuine Nouns art track record is noted, but the partnership subsection overrides the below-cap default and sets AGAINST absent enforceable deliverables.
>
> [ suggestions ]
> - Embed enforceable profit-sharing and reporting via milestones or streaming rather than an off-chain future agreement
> - Have the partner acquire and verifiably hold a Noun before resubmitting per I.8
> - Direct funds to a named business entity with independent oversight to reduce self-dealing risk
>
> more @ nounsvote.com