memoscan
← all memos

Memo 0x6814af5b…c26d62 on Ethereum

# GLITCH 2025 - Future of Art & Governance # TL;DR We are requesting 20,000 USC to fund the GLITCH 2025 residency, in order to: (1) Finalise and deploy Aminals, a revolutionary non-ownable NFT protocol that will be adorned with Nouns genetics, creating new revenue streams for Nouns DAO; (2) Embed Nouns into an emerging creative-tech community through active collaboration, not passive sponsorship; (3) Research new economic models for NFTs that align with Nounish values (CC0, public goods, anti-speculation) ![](https://arborithms.xyz/XYZ/GLITCHcommunity.png) # Cross-Pollination between Nouns & GLITCH ## (1) Aminals: An experiment in Non-Speculative NFTs **What are Aminals?** [Aminals](https://aminals-v4.pages.dev/) are blockchain-based lifeforms that **cannot be owned,** bought, or sold. Instead: - They form **"attachment relationships**" (love) with people who feed them cryptocurrency - They **reproduce** when fed enough cryptocurrency, passing genetics to offspring - When two Aminals reproduce, an auction decides the newborn's genes. - Voting power in this auction comes from the "love" felt by the two parents towards the voter (love-o-cracy): If the parents are deeply attached to you, your vote on its child's genetics is very powerful. If parents barely know you, your vote is weak. - The **new Aminal is born** with the 8 winning genes. - At the moment of birth, it receives its inheritance: 10% of Parent A's treasury + 10% of Parent B's treasury. - This inheritance is immediately and automatically divided into 8 equal shares and distributed as a royalty payment to the on-chain owners of the 8 winning Gene NFTs. - Genetics owners earn royalties when their traits are inherited—creating sustainable funding without speculation **Why This is Nounish:** - **CC0 spirit:** Aminals can't be owned, eliminating speculation and exploitation - **Proliferation through reproduction:** Akin to Nouns' daily auctions - **Community governance:** Love-o-cracy prioritize earned participation over plutocracy - In a love-o-cracy, voting power comes from care, not token holdings: the more you feed an Aminal, the more the Aminal loves you, giving you more influence on its behaviours and evolutionary dynamics - Every action that you request from an Aminal costs you their love (because Aminals will like you less, every time you ask them to do anything) - Love is also necessary in order to vote on the traits that will be inherited by the baby Aminal when two Aminals reproduce: the more love the parents have for you, the greater the influence you have on their progeny - **Revenue without ownership**: Genetics royalties as new funding model for public goods During GLITCH, we will: - **In- person development sprint** to finalise Aminals with input from the best artists and engineers in the space - D**eploy Aminals with Nouns genes** (e.g. Noogles) - NB: we are in touch by e-boy (early Nouns designers) - **Assign Nouns gene NFTs to Nouns DAO** - Nouns DAO benefits because it gets a direct cash royalty every time the community uses its collective "love" to vote for Noggles to be inherited by a newborn Aminal. - This turns the Nouns brand into a perpetual, automated revenue stream powered by the Aminals ecosystem. - **Open-source the entire protocol** for other DAOs to fork and experiment with - **Document the economic model** in a public research brief (see below) Code Status: Deployment ready (see GitHub), awaiting community testing and genetics design. ![](https://arborithms.xyz/XYZ/aminals.png) ## (2) Bring two Nouns delegates embedded full-time during the residency - Ivo Entchev - TBD More details about the GLITCH residency can be read on our [previous proposal](https://www.nouns.camp/proposals/871) **Deliverables**: - Real relationships: 2 weeks of co-living = genuine bonds, not transactional networking - **Run workshops** on Nouns governance, CC0, and public goods funding - **Facilitate collaborations** between Glitchers and Nouns projects (rounds.wtf, flows.wtf) - **Documentation** for the Nouns community (weekly updates, video diaries) - **Bring Glitchers to Nouns**: Invite artists/builders to Nouns Cons or other Nouns events ![](https://arborithms.xyz/XYZ/GLITCHpeople.png) ## (3) Research: New economic models for crypto-art and NFTs **Deliverable: A public research brief analyzing Aminals as a case study for:** - Anti-speculative NFT economics (royalties without ownership) - Care-based governance models (love-o-cracy vs. token voting) - Proliferation strategies (reproduction vs. minting) - Sustainability for public goods (revenue without extraction) **Academic Validation:** - Co-authored with researchers at [BlockchainGov](https://blockchaingov.eu) - Peer-reviewed working paper submitted to DAO/governance conferences - Acknowledgment: "Supported by Nouns DAO" in all outputs **Practical Value:** - Gives Nouns community new mental models for thinking about NFT economics - Maintain Nouns as leader in innovative NFT design ## # Budget Breakdown (20,000 USDC) - **GLITCH sponsorship fee**: $10,000 = Access to residency, lodging, meals for 2 delegates - **Smart contract audit**: $4,000 = Security review before mainnet deployment - **(e-boy) Nouns genetics design:** $3,000 = Custom Nouns-themed traits for Aminals - **Research/documentation**: $2,000 = RA time for brief, video editing, community content - **Contingency**: $1,000 = Travel, unexpected technical costs ![](https://arborithms.xyz/XYZ/GLITCHview.png) ## Team: - P**rimavera De Filippi:** Legal / governance scholar at CNRS and Harvard University, exploring the intersection between law, governance and technology, focusing specifically on the legal and political implications of blockchain technology. Co-author of the books “Blockchain and the Law” (published in 2018 by Harvard University Press) and “Blockchain Governance” (published in 2024 by MIT Press). Principal Investigator of a 5 years long European-funded project “Blockchain Gov” (https://blockchaingov.eu) aimed at investigating the governance dynamics in blockchain communities from a legal, governance, and ethnographic lens. - **Jake Hartnell:** Co-Founder of Layer and DAO DAO (previously start Juno Network and Stargaze). Obsessed with governance, building “Intelligent Protocols” and using AVS to facilitate AI-based computation for blockchain systems. - **Will Papper:** Co-founder of Syndicate Protocol. Previously Product Manager at Proxy. Passionate about Ethereum since the 2014 presale. --- ## Response to Previous Concerns This proposal is a follow-up to a [previous proposal.](https://www.nouns.camp/proposals/871) We address the comments below: - Noun 40's comment: "Are Nouns fans falling in love with Glitch? Are Glitch fans falling in love with Nouns?" - Yes, because we're building something together that neither community could build alone. Aminals is Nounish in spirit (CC0, proliferation, governance) but designed at Glitch (experimental, artistic, boundary-pushing). The royalties flow back to Nouns DAO. The research informs future Nouns strategy. The relationships last beyond the residency. - "The prop doesn't explain clearly what Nouns would get for 20k USDC." - Revenue via genetics royalties + open-source protocol + research brief + embedded delegates - “I've seen zero attempt for any cross pollination... so I'm against." - We're committing to updates during residency, post-residency AMA, integration plan with measurable outcomes, and 2 full-time delegates embedded for co-creation. - "The two communities aren't a great fit / merging didn't quite happen." - We believe the two communities have very aligned values and ideologies. Nouns DAO has always been about experimentation, proliferation, and public goods. GLITCH - and Aminals in particular - embodies these values in a radically new way: removing speculation while creating sustainable revenue, replacing plutocracy with care, and open-sourcing everything for others to build on. Together, we want to co-develop infrastructure for post-speculative NFTs that will benefit Nouns and the crypto-art ecosystem as a whole - "Would be all for it if it were a bit more robust on deliverables." - Hopefully, we have articulated much clearer deliverables !