0x982312e1…d4c5sent to0x6dfa413b…492d·#24,902,086·view on Etherscan
I’m voting for this because, realistically, you can’t run something like this without a legal layer handling the off-chain stuff. Compliance, IP, and dealing with legal issues aren’t things you can wait days or weeks to vote on every single time. This gives the project the ability to actually function in the real world without constantly bottlenecking itself through governance. The constraints around no direct treasury control and tying actions back to DAO-approved decisions are good and keep this from turning into a free-for-all.
That said, there are still some concerns that need tightening. The scope is a bit broad in places—especially around handling disputes and managing off-chain assets—and “defensive only” isn’t clearly defined. There’s also no real detail on how transparency is enforced or how the DAO steps in if something goes wrong or someone oversteps. I’m fine moving this forward because it’s necessary, but those gaps should be addressed so it doesn’t turn into a trust-based system with no clear accountability.