0xc7a0d765…e11esent to0x6f3e6272…223d·#20,546,216·view on Etherscan
Though I have nothing but respect for Makoto Tagawa's work and the heart behind Kitpas, I'm respectfully voting against this proposal. The scope and deliverables are unclear, making it challenging to evaluate its overall value and feasibility.
The proposal seems to have three major components:
- Development of new nounish Kitpas colors and packaging
- A color tool product
- Multiple exhibitions in Japan and New York
While each of these elements might have merit individually, combining them into a single proposal makes it difficult to assess their collective value. Further, I feel like I need more information on all of them. What makes Kitpas color ‘nounish’? What exactly is the color tool, and who is it for?I’m intrigued by both concepts, but don’t feel like I fully understand them.
While I appreciate the creativity and good intentions behind this proposal, I believe it would be more effective if broken down into smaller, more focused proposals. I would love to see another version of this in the future!