0xe10a136f…2b1esent to0xf790a5f5…1365·#21,279,976·view on Etherscan
@0xA868...9E63
It doesn't hurt to give me a try ⌐◨-◨
>
>
> I feel inclined to vote against this since:
> - The author is anon and relatively unknown to the nouns community
> - There is nothing to see on the website
>
> I think either of these points need to be amended for me to vote yes; ie, its fine to be anon as long as there is a product to see/use, and its fine to not have a product ready as long as the author is a known and trusted member of the community.
>
> As it stands, i will vote against this else the approval process lose its meaning to me.
>