0x32d1a53f…d4f5sent to0x6f3e6272…223d·#19,621,162·view on Etherscan
didnt think i had so much to say about this until i read mikegood vwr. immediately clear to me he has the most nounish take.
i think coral's point about brand referencing (& cc0 licensing as pre-requisite mentioend by 41) make sense as reasons for an against vote, but unsure if downvoting for aesthetic reasons is healthy culturally, in a dynamic quorum governance context. is brett attacking the protocol with 90's vibes?
an alternative would be to abstain and see if the head has enough positive support to make it through (could increase quorum requirement if not satisfied with current limit or have a different dynamic quorum requirement over Noundry submissions). feels odd to say hell no to someone's earnest self-expression.. maybe we can move towards a more optimistic governance norm in future.
just at the practical level imagine if we were faced with 1000 separate trait props/ easier to simply not vote and have a higher threshold and possibly a bit less discouraging idk