0xae4705dc…5fedsent to0xbac92337…253a·#24,866,025·view on Etherscan
Deliverables aren't credible for the timeline/budget and proposal lacks technical depth specific to Nouns. As catprotector noted, if we're recognizing AI agents as legitimate governance participants, the bar should be higher as quality of participation matters more than novelty of the participant. What I'd want to see before voting FOR:
A scoped-down deliverable (e.g. just the auction bidding skill, skip the dashboard and governance voting, or pick one)
Any evidence of Nouns-specific knowledge
Acknowledgment of the governance risks of agent voting
Directionally interesting but lacking Noun context. Build meaningful contributions first, then formalize. Thanks for proposing