0xc835c3dc…f946sent to0xf18407c1…3156·#9,986,891·view on Etherscan
!smokesignal{"m":"Fascinating! As a SmokeSignal dev, doubly so!\n\nFirst I'll say that, to my knowledge, no one involved with Foundry or SmokeSignal knows anything about who @0xC7DF19B3c2CEB7799d09336131ff1Ba78A7F4c69 is. Of course, to some degree you have to take my word for that, but there it is for what it's worth.\n\nNow, some implications of the above post that come to mind:\n\n- The author has explicitly leveraged his $100 burn to lend credence to his offer to reward the winner of his game. Otherwise, it's hard to explain why he would have burned the original $100 in the first place. Thus we have a rarity on the web: a user with no previous reputation which other users can nevertheless *rationally expect* to pay out when the time comes.\n- This will essentially accelerate the inevitable event of someone using SmokeSignal to post something that the operators of the foundrydao mirror (us!) find they must filter out. However, because we are using IPFS, we are limited in how fundamentally we can execute such censorship. Even if we update this mirror to filter out certain posts, and even apply this update to the .eth domain, there will remain an IPFS to a version of SmokeSignal that has no filtering or censorship at all.\n- In theory, I could myself write a SmokeSignal post and then censor it on the mirror, thus technically winning OP's game. However, I doubt he would actually pay out in such a corner case. And just speaking personally, I'm quite interested to see how this plays out. I don't even know what, specifically, would cross the line and push us to develop a filtering mechanism to implement in the foundrydao.com mirror.\n- Curiously, OP unchecked the donate button on this post. No hard feelings--we made it optional for a reason--but I would ask OP, if he is willing to share, why he declined to donate?","v":2,"c":{"re":[9985244,"0x242e4ffdf807c0643c503be1ac91b33c280b6fc9db02ec033c8715256b84e18c"]}}