0xf7253a0e…0041sent to0x1f3d3a7a…0591·#22,069,699·view on Etherscan
We vote FOR the proposal.
The incentives requested in the proposal can (1) help the migration of liquidity from v3 to v4 and (2) bring more TVL/volume to Unichain. As described in the proposal, incentive programs are common in the ecosystem - and can be one-off solutions to grow new solutions.
However, it is important that KPIs are managed. Tracking the efficiency of capital allocation in liquidity programs is key to not throwing money at the DAO with no return for it. If the KPIs are not met, the Gauntlet must draw up new plans to achieve the objectives stipulated in the proposal. If they don't succeed, the money should go back to the DAO.
In addition, it's essential to think about the long-term strategy - mentioned by Gauntlet/UF in the proposal. We know how incentive programs can work for a short time - only as long as rewards are distributed to users. It is essential that capital allocation is done with this in mind, with a view to not repeating the same problems of other projects that have done the same in the market.
We also advocate the creation of a proposal that encourages more Hooks to be created on Uniswap. However, it would be interesting to fund mainly those that bring some kind of return to the DAO.