0xa47f6056…ec67sent to0xf790a5f5…1365·#24,223,238·view on Etherscan
@0xBe14...57e6
Hey Humpty, thanks for voting! I agree that having a recurring process is a great idea and something we should build.
That said, the process was not arbitrary. These people were the most voted ones after the winners. If I’d chosen three, then I’d agree it’d be arbitrary. I chose five because that was the initial number of winners, so the cutoff follows the same logic.
In the end, this vote is simply about whether these long-term committed builders and artists deserve 1% of the Nouns sitting in the treasury or not.
>
>
> some of the people are very deserving of a noun and im all for rewarding them accordingly. however, the selection process feels a bit arbitrary. id like to have us create a repeatable and fair process first for rewarding active participants.
>