0x7bc48221…3332sent to0xf790a5f5…1365·#22,539,340·view on Etherscan
should-nouns-dao-explore-escrowed-milestones?@0x05A1...011c
Hi willywonka.eth!
Thank you so much for taking the time to respond at that length. First of, by no means was my intention to imply that your proposal has any actual risk of non-delivery or malice. Your proposal was just brought up as a good candidate and I wanted to act on this suggestion.
Also I totally understand that you don't want your candidate to be left hanging while waiting for us. Both your suggestions, i.e. the frames collaboration and using milestones in the future, are super interesting. Perhaps we can have some sync time over the next couple of weeks to get to know each other and align on how we want to work together. What do you think?
> gm benedictvs.eth!
>
> Personally in favor of implementing support for Milestone-based payments for the reasons you listed. Also open to exploring what milestone based funding could look like for Nounspace, but would prefer not to hinge our current candidate on this since it's not live yet.
>
> Our current candidate requests a stream, which as you mentioned isn't necessarily as strict as milestones, but does at least provide some recourse if for any reason we don't deliver. Further, I'd argue that delivery risk is also mitigated by the fact that we have already delivered a substantial amount (far beyond what we initially committed to in the Prop House round) and will also be streaming our governance token, $SPACE, to Nouns' treasury.
>
> If our current candidate doesn't pass and milestone-based payments are activated before we propose a v2, we'd be happy to explore this in our v2. Further, when milestone payments are activated, we'd love to build a mini app for tracking milestone progress and facilitating fund release or arbitration that can be automatically added to a tab for all passed props in proposal spaces (https://warpcast.com/willywonka.eth/0xfdb75dd4); there's more details on what this could look like in our candidate.