0x10c9fd78…759csent to0xf6d9b3ae…c172·#7,688,708·view on Etherscan
Are you in favor of changing point 4 of article 10 to "any two members of the board signatory rights vis a vis 3rd parties is valid"?
Memo 0xe1b7be73…251d62 on Ethereum
unknown sendersent to0x92b42536…56ba·#7,688,708·view on Etherscan
Are you in favor of changing point 4 of article 10 to "any two members of the board signatory rights vis a vis 3rd parties is valid"?
unknown sendersent to0xf6d9b3ae…c172·#7,688,708·view on Etherscan
Are you in favor of changing point 4 of article 10 to "any two members of the board signatory rights vis a vis 3rd parties is valid"?