0xf7253a0e…0041sent to0x1f3d3a7a…0591·#22,068,828·view on Etherscan
We vote FOR the Uniswap Unleashed proposal.
The Uniswap Foundation's request for ~U$125M for Grants and Operations is relevant and will be important to (1) contribute to the development/growth of Hooks and (2) attract more projects/people to build on Uniswap/Unichain.
We understand the competitiveness of the market, but we agree with the concern expressed by other delegates: it's a high amount and paid all at once. An update on the fulfillment of the KPIs proposed by Devin in the proposal is essential for us to understand the allocation of capital in this proposal.
Just as we voted for the proposal on incentives for Uniswap v4/Unichain, we are concerned about how both products will benefit the DAO. We understand that the success of both is indirectly beneficial to the Uniswap DAO, but (1) there is still no direct revenue sharing mechanism and (2) most Hooks do not choose to enable charging a fee on applications created with the product.
Therefore, we would like UF to continue the good work, funding good projects and supporting the evolution of Uniswap - as a product and DAO - but also to carry out actions with the organization in mind, holders of $UNI, its delegates and the entire body of people working on Uniswap governance.
Good synergy between UF, Uniswap Labs and the DAO is essential. All parties need to be heard and have power to make decisions.