0x32d1a53f…d4f5sent to0x6f3e6272…223d·#19,759,096·view on Etherscan
stand by all of my earlier comments
some things to consider
afaik anyone can register an id & mint an nft. wrt to the contracts/changes, this is all a 'client' is.
if true, at the on-chain level these are direct incentives to engage with the protocol. They are , in the plainest sense possible, not incentive-compatible with the stated purpose.
The noun-owner decides which id to route to. they will push rewards to the ids they favor.
i encourage thinking opportunistically (imagine you are someone with a lot of votes that wants to use these incentives to steer behavior or farm) .
The majority can drain because they can claim all the incentives (distribute nouns to indiv wallets, produce n + n^2 interactions per vote cycle) and vote to approve. seems little basis for saying the efficient outcome is unlikely to happen.
its tricky to force specific off-chain behaviors (esp of secondary actors/ middle-men) with on-chain mechanics. while, at a small enough network size people may play along, this doesn't relieve any governance burden since the dao will be deciding case by case on subsidizing clients, which is already the default state.
its on-chain bloat without any real possibility of scaling benefit & downstream it leads to further centralization.
the thing i think no one wants to face but that i think we can do relatively easily- sybil layer/ nounish personhood badge- makes it work.