0xae65e700…46c0sent to0x6f3e6272…223d·#21,175,895·view on Etherscan
+1
> It pains me to vote against this cause I do really miss seeing Nouns Amigos on chain, but agree with these- for 3 nouns I'd prefer a delegate system instead of just handing them out, even with the voting record already shown.
>
> If the wait for that is too long, I'd probably vote For a single noun based on the history and the people involved, prove the experiment with more recent on-chain voting (a lot can happen in 6 months) and build up to 3.
>
> +1
>
> > Until we have better sub-delegation tools (allowing the DAO to retain custody while another party can re-delegate the votes) and simultaneously a fix for the bug that allows bricking a Noun with delegation (https://mirror.xyz/verbsteam.eth/TP917T6vm6gXuVAxbQ34ZCn7dNiHabu3UW-ninwalVc) —both coming soon!— it’s best to not transfer Nouns out and instead find alternate ways to achieve the same governance experiments.
> >
> > +1
> >
> > > I think you should try getting delegations from existing holder rather than getting Nouns directly. A campaign in Farcaster to attract holders could work
>
> +1
>
> > I agree. Would love to see delegation from the treasury enabled before experiments like this. And when proven effective, reward nouns as retro maybe. I think there'd be multiple metagov groups that would be deserving of nouns too.
> >
> > +1
> >
> > > Until we have better sub-delegation tools (allowing the DAO to retain custody while another party can re-delegate the votes) and simultaneously a fix for the bug that allows bricking a Noun with delegation (https://mirror.xyz/verbsteam.eth/TP917T6vm6gXuVAxbQ34ZCn7dNiHabu3UW-ninwalVc) —both coming soon!— it’s best to not transfer Nouns out and instead find alternate ways to achieve the same governance experiments.
> > >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > > I think you should try getting delegations from existing holder rather than getting Nouns directly. A campaign in Farcaster to attract holders could work
>
> +1
>
> > Love what you guys are doing with amigos. 3mo voting record is impressive but I am left wondering how many people made up the voting block on an average vote? Is that listed somewhere? I think thats important based on how many nouns are being requested.
> >
> > I'm all for delegation to sub-groups to experiment with voting and gifting nouns to sub-groups with track records of voting responsibly, a decent amount of pre-existing participants, and are expanding their voting block over time.. It feels like thats whats going on here with Amigos. Just want to make sure its more than a handful of amigos voting if the group is getting 3 nouns- otherwise maybe re-start the experiment a bit smaller with one noun.