memoscan
← all memos

Memo 0xf9bef3c9…ecc712 on Ethereum

Encrypt The Mempool! - Provide feedback on the draft EIPs (8105 & 8184)### Introduction This topic is for submitting claims to the Encrypt The Mempool! bounty on POIDH ### Deliverable: Provide feedback on the draft EIPs (8105 & 8184) to encrypt the public mempool on Ethereum Mainnet. ### Reference / background materials: - EIP-8105: Universal Enshrined Encrypted Mempool - https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-8105 - https://blog.shutter.network/introducing-the-universal-enshrined-encrypted-mempool-eip/ - https://ethereum-magicians.org/t/hegota-headliner-proposal-eip-8105-universal-enshrined-encrypted-mempool-eem/27448 - EIP-8184: LUCID - https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-8184 - https://ethereum-magicians.org/t/hegota-headliner-lucid-encrypted-mempool/27658 ### Suggested Topics: - dealing with key withholding attacks - leveraging FRAME transactions to simplify and future-proof the protocol - improving transaction execution quality - allowing monetization of benign backrunning - changes which could accelerate adoption once implemented - analyzing impact on different applications ### Eligibility: - open to anyone - special invitation for Ethereum core developers and researchers, client teams, and Ethereum Protocol Fellows ### Submit A Claim: 1. Post your feedback on https://ethereum-magicians.org/t/encrypt-the-mempool-provide-feedback-on-the-draft-eips-8105-8184/28804 2. Post a thread on X (optional) 3. Submit a screenshot of your Ethereum Magicians (or other cover image) post on this page - include link(s) to Ethereum Magicians (and thread on X if applicable) in your claim description ### Discussion & Refinement After posting your feedback on Ethereum Magicians, you may continue to discuss and make refinements. Feedback will be evaluated based on the entire revision history and "final" state at the deadline. ### Minimum Submission Requirements Feedback must include at least one of the following: - identification of a technical limitation, risk, or attack vector - a proposed improvement to the design - analysis of tradeoffs between alternative approaches - discussion of implementation complexity or deployment considerations - economic analysis related to MEV, censorship resistance, or incentives Simple expressions of support or agreement are not eligible. Comments that do not fit the minimum submission requirement may be removed from the forum discussion and associated claims will be hidden on this page. ### Deadline: EOD July 30 ### Selection: After the deadline, contributors will vote to award the bounty pool to one winner or to cancel the bounty (if there are no high quality submissions).