0xfdf6bf98…aad3sent to0x2bbb7866…4155·#4,586,690·view on Etherscan
Thanks for appreciation!
…And about what you wrote about inequality between "incentive inputs" (as i call it, discussing BPs with my pals):
IMHO burning not 40/50 at once, but 10 mETH would be more stimulating towards an honest discussion about payers expectations. It would give more freedom, and assured stability of task for a worker to actually get on more candid way with payer :)
The game is between human beings using machines, not a game of the machine using humans - and though i know how pretentious it sounds - i feel oliged to point it out from a standpoint od an UX artist. Anyhow - BOTTOM LINE
BPs need IMO partial burning option, or at least dedicated discussing platform -
they could benefit from voting on "level of accomplishment" between co-funding payers
TY, CU on Medium ;; X07077