memoscan

0x1872…9261

All memos sent from and to 0x1872…9261.
unknown sendersent to0x1872b969…9261·#11,784,800·0x5a29fc1e…37e27f
GProposal for PowerPool translators Abstract: Translation of PowerPool Medium articles to following languages: Russian, Spanish, Chinese, Vietnamese, Thai, Portuguese, Korean, Malay, Turkish, Hindi by community members for community members who doesn`t know English language enough to understand original articles. Motivation: Due to this research: Crypto adoption + English proficiency statistics 1 there are countries with highest crypto adoption and lack of knowledge of English language. This proposal will make residents of these countries available to understand the idea of PowerPool and stay in touch with updates. Roadmap/Timeline/KPIs/what will be delivered: All the articles going to be translated without full-machine translation and posted in PowerPool_RU (for example) medium before deadline. More details here: Proposal 17: Translator`s value proposition for PowerPool Compensation: 10 weeks vesting for all the rewards. List of translators is here https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1wwZ0pjP86WzhYPvf_YvZNOl5mNg0IKHAomPQ5JHoA2I/edit#gid=308031923 2 (and all the info about our job) Leveling system will help PowerPool keep translators loyal for a long period of time. The longer translator works with project, the better he is doing his job: Common translator: 0–24 articles translated; 0.025 CVP per word in the first 24 articles translated Uncommon translator: 25–49 articles translated; 0.03 CVP per word in next 24 articles translated. Rare translator: 50–74 articles translated; 0.035 CVP per word in next 24 articles translated. Epic translator: 75–99 articles translated; 0.04 CVP per word in next 24 articles translated. Legendary translator: 100+ articles translated; 0.045 CVP per word in next 100 articles translated. Raid boss: 200+ articles translated. 0.05 CVP per word in next articles translated. Also I request payment for January (https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1wwZ0pjP86WzhYPvf_YvZNOl5mNg0IKHAomPQ5JHoA2I/edit#gid=857175712 4): Yahile#8344 , Chinese, joined in the middle of January - 87 CVP vanducff#0615, Vietnamese, joined in the end of January - 18 CVP Moon_blow#6269, Turkish, joined in the end of January - 61 CVP alb2001#2529, Spanish, joined in October - 180 CVP Getmegone#2897, Russian, joined in October - 180 + 34 = 216 CVP Background/relevant info about service provider/testimonials/previous experience: Translating articles from PowerPool Medium into Russian since October 2020 (40+ articles already translated, about 700 views per month usually), early LP, part of research team, unofficial Revisor Translation Officer, business-developer at regular work).
0x4524eb19…0fdfsent to0x1872b969…9261·#11,784,800·0x5a29fc1e…37e27f
Proposal for PowerPool translators Abstract: Translation of PowerPool Medium articles to following languages: Russian, Spanish, Chinese, Vietnamese, Thai, Portuguese, Korean, Malay, Turkish, Hindi by community members for community members who doesn`t know English language enough to understand original articles. Motivation: Due to this research: Crypto adoption + English proficiency statistics 1 there are countries with highest crypto adoption and lack of knowledge of English language. This proposal will make residents of these countries available to understand the idea of PowerPool and stay in touch with updates. Roadmap/Timeline/KPIs/what will be delivered: All the articles going to be translated without full-machine translation and posted in PowerPool_RU (for example) medium before deadline. More details here: Proposal 17: Translator`s value proposition for PowerPool Compensation: 10 weeks vesting for all the rewards. List of translators is here https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1wwZ0pjP86WzhYPvf_YvZNOl5mNg0IKHAomPQ5JHoA2I/edit#gid=308031923 2 (and all the info about our job) Leveling system will help PowerPool keep translators loyal for a long period of time. The longer translator works with project, the better he is doing his job: Common translator: 0–24 articles translated; 0.025 CVP per word in the first 24 articles translated Uncommon translator: 25–49 articles translated; 0.03 CVP per word in next 24 articles translated. Rare translator: 50–74 articles translated; 0.035 CVP per word in next 24 articles translated. Epic translator: 75–99 articles translated; 0.04 CVP per word in next 24 articles translated. Legendary translator: 100+ articles translated; 0.045 CVP per word in next 100 articles translated. Raid boss: 200+ articles translated. 0.05 CVP per word in next articles translated. Also I request payment for January (https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1wwZ0pjP86WzhYPvf_YvZNOl5mNg0IKHAomPQ5JHoA2I/edit#gid=857175712 4): Yahile#8344 , Chinese, joined in the middle of January - 87 CVP vanducff#0615, Vietnamese, joined in the end of January - 18 CVP Moon_blow#6269, Turkish, joined in the end of January - 61 CVP alb2001#2529, Spanish, joined in October - 180 CVP Getmegone#2897, Russian, joined in October - 180 + 34 = 216 CVP Background/relevant info about service provider/testimonials/previous experience: Translating articles from PowerPool Medium into Russian since October 2020 (40+ articles already translated, about 700 views per month usually), early LP, part of research team, unofficial Revisor Translation Officer, business-developer at regular work).
unknown sendersent to0x1872b969…9261·#11,775,328·0xf7384361…1a2085
Proposal 20: Re-define rewards for PIPT, YETI; keep the same for CVP-ETH Summary 1. Eliminate YETI-ETH Balancer rewards (the main pair will be Sushiswap YETI-ETH pair rewarded by Sushi Onsen Program) 2. Decrease YETI staking rewards from 0.83 CVP/block to 0.5 CVP/block 3. Move PIPT-ETH liquidity from Balancer to Sushiswap and keep the same rewards as for PIPT-ETH Balancer, PIPT-ETH Balancer = zero rewards, all rewards for Sushiswap PIPT-ETH pair 4. Decrease PIPT staking rewards by 50% (from 1.09 to 0.545 CVP/block) 5. Keep CVP-ETH Uniswap reward the same as before These changes will be valid until a new proposal focused on CVP Liquidity Mining Program will pass.
0x6da0514f…f75bsent to0x1872b969…9261·#11,775,328·0xf7384361…1a2085
Proposal 20: Re-define rewards for PIPT, YETI; keep the same for CVP-ETH Summary 1. Eliminate YETI-ETH Balancer rewards (the main pair will be Sushiswap YETI-ETH pair rewarded by Sushi Onsen Program) 2. Decrease YETI staking rewards from 0.83 CVP/block to 0.5 CVP/block 3. Move PIPT-ETH liquidity from Balancer to Sushiswap and keep the same rewards as for PIPT-ETH Balancer, PIPT-ETH Balancer = zero rewards, all rewards for Sushiswap PIPT-ETH pair 4. Decrease PIPT staking rewards by 50% (from 1.09 to 0.545 CVP/block) 5. Keep CVP-ETH Uniswap reward the same as before These changes will be valid until a new proposal focused on CVP Liquidity Mining Program will pass.
unknown sendersent to0x1872b969…9261·#11,680,462·0x07466aac…121fbd
Proposal 19: Smart Ecosystem Fund Summary: Launch Ecosystem Fund initiative for rewarding PowerPool community contributors. The size of the Ecosystem fund is not limited by any particular CVP number and depends on approved proposals. Reward community contributors that already provided valuable services by direct payment from team’s multi-sig (according to the thread: https://gov.powerpool.finance/t/smart-ecosystem-fund-idea/596/34): 1. @Getmegone 37 translations: 1030 CVP 2. @alb2001 36 translations: 909.2 CVP Collect all contributors allocations into the next proposal and vote on them (allocation size and vesting rules to be defined in discussion): 1. protocol politicians and strategy - @Sergey, @zero, @defi, @dae 2. translators: @Getmegone, @alb200 3. marketing, content, etc if there will be any submissions Create a special category on the forum: Ecosystem Fund and track all submissions and results there. Assign most active community members: @sergey @zero @dae @defi @vasilysumanov as community revisers for tracking submissions and results. Add @Getmegone to the Revisers team as responsible for translations. Motivation: PowerPool protocol grows rapidly and requires additional community efforts for sustainable growth and development. This work should be rewarded in CVP tokens. The community previously raised this issue in several forum threads and received a lot of responses and support: https://gov.powerpool.finance/t/proposal-17-translator-s-value-proposition-for-powerpool/562 https://gov.powerpool.finance/t/proposal-14-use-350k-cvp-from-canceled-testers-allocations-to-create-strategic-community-rewards-pool/460 https://gov.powerpool.finance/t/smart-ecosystem-fund-idea/596 Specification: The “Community contributor” definition means any community member that can provide valuable service to the community in any form - strategy, research, coding, design, social media promotion, content creation, translations, youtube promotion, etc. Security audits for PowerPool products and other expenses are also included in the “Community contribution” category. Payment should be linearly vested which ensures the possibility to return stake back to the community if work wasn’t provided or didn’t meet KPIs or deadlines. The selection of community contributors should work as follows: 1. Community member raises a topic regarding his contribution to CVP community with KPIs/deadlines. 2. Community discuss proposed services, compensation size and vesting scheme. 3. Anyone from Community Revisers group issues an official proposal 4. If the proposal was approved, necessary amount of CVP is deposited to the vesting contract and can be claimed by community contributor’s address Every community contributor that received vested payment should open a thread at the forum under the Ecosystem Fund category and publish work results according to roadmap/KPIs/deadlines. If the community isn’t satisfied with the results, a dispute should be opened. Dispute algorithm: 1. Any community member can contact anyone from the Community Revisers team (@sergey @zero @dae @defi @vasilysumanov or @getmegone) if he is isn’t satisfied with services provided. 2. Members of the Community Revisers team open discussions in the thread related to this service/community contribution. 3. After clarification of the situation there are two options: (1) service is provided correctly and fully according to initially stated KPIs/deadlines/roadmap (2) service isn't provided correctly and CVP stake (share that is still locked according to the vesting schedule) should be returned to team’s multi-sig. 4. In case of 3(2) special proposal is officially issued by anyone from Community Revisers team. 5. If proposal issued according to point 4 is approved by the community, remaining CVP stake is returned back to the community (team’s multi-sig)
0xa84e2bec…d20asent to0x1872b969…9261·#11,680,462·0x07466aac…121fbd
Proposal 19: Smart Ecosystem Fund Summary: Launch Ecosystem Fund initiative for rewarding PowerPool community contributors. The size of the Ecosystem fund is not limited by any particular CVP number and depends on approved proposals. Reward community contributors that already provided valuable services by direct payment from team’s multi-sig (according to the thread: https://gov.powerpool.finance/t/smart-ecosystem-fund-idea/596/34): 1. @Getmegone 37 translations: 1030 CVP 2. @alb2001 36 translations: 909.2 CVP Collect all contributors allocations into the next proposal and vote on them (allocation size and vesting rules to be defined in discussion): 1. protocol politicians and strategy - @Sergey, @zero, @defi, @dae 2. translators: @Getmegone, @alb200 3. marketing, content, etc if there will be any submissions Create a special category on the forum: Ecosystem Fund and track all submissions and results there. Assign most active community members: @sergey @zero @dae @defi @vasilysumanov as community revisers for tracking submissions and results. Add @Getmegone to the Revisers team as responsible for translations. Motivation: PowerPool protocol grows rapidly and requires additional community efforts for sustainable growth and development. This work should be rewarded in CVP tokens. The community previously raised this issue in several forum threads and received a lot of responses and support: https://gov.powerpool.finance/t/proposal-17-translator-s-value-proposition-for-powerpool/562 https://gov.powerpool.finance/t/proposal-14-use-350k-cvp-from-canceled-testers-allocations-to-create-strategic-community-rewards-pool/460 https://gov.powerpool.finance/t/smart-ecosystem-fund-idea/596 Specification: The “Community contributor” definition means any community member that can provide valuable service to the community in any form - strategy, research, coding, design, social media promotion, content creation, translations, youtube promotion, etc. Security audits for PowerPool products and other expenses are also included in the “Community contribution” category. Payment should be linearly vested which ensures the possibility to return stake back to the community if work wasn’t provided or didn’t meet KPIs or deadlines. The selection of community contributors should work as follows: 1. Community member raises a topic regarding his contribution to CVP community with KPIs/deadlines. 2. Community discuss proposed services, compensation size and vesting scheme. 3. Anyone from Community Revisers group issues an official proposal 4. If the proposal was approved, necessary amount of CVP is deposited to the vesting contract and can be claimed by community contributor’s address Every community contributor that received vested payment should open a thread at the forum under the Ecosystem Fund category and publish work results according to roadmap/KPIs/deadlines. If the community isn’t satisfied with the results, a dispute should be opened. Dispute algorithm: 1. Any community member can contact anyone from the Community Revisers team (@sergey @zero @dae @defi @vasilysumanov or @getmegone) if he is isn’t satisfied with services provided. 2. Members of the Community Revisers team open discussions in the thread related to this service/community contribution. 3. After clarification of the situation there are two options: (1) service is provided correctly and fully according to initially stated KPIs/deadlines/roadmap (2) service isn't provided correctly and CVP stake (share that is still locked according to the vesting schedule) should be returned to team’s multi-sig. 4. In case of 3(2) special proposal is officially issued by anyone from Community Revisers team. 5. If proposal issued according to point 4 is approved by the community, remaining CVP stake is returned back to the community (team’s multi-sig)
unknown sendersent to0x1872b969…9261·#11,668,322·0x0bd9e474…86a087
2Proposal 18: Create Yearn Lazy Ape Index Summary Launch an index in the PowerPool ecosystem consisting of Yearn vault tokens: 1. curve.fi/Compound LP -https://etherscan.io/address/0x629c759D1E83eFbF63d84eb3868B564d9521C129#code 2. curve.fi/3pool LP - https://etherscan.io/address/0x9cA85572E6A3EbF24dEDd195623F188735A5179f#code 3. curve.fi/mUSD LP - https://etherscan.io/address/0x0FCDAeDFb8A7DfDa2e9838564c5A1665d856AFDF#code 4. curve.fi/GUSD LP - https://etherscan.io/address/0xcC7E70A958917cCe67B4B87a8C30E6297451aE98#code 5. curve.fi/y LP - https://etherscan.io/address/0x5dbcF33D8c2E976c6b560249878e6F1491Bca25c#code 6. curve.fi/busd LP - https://etherscan.io/address/0x2994529C0652D127b7842094103715ec5299bBed#code Instead of using equal weights -- 16.66% -- use adaptive weights proportional to vaults TVL [1]. Proposed name "Yearn Lazy Ape Index" with token symbol "YLA". The index serves 2 purposes: - smoothen APY generated by vaults; - create liquidity sink for yTokens and effectively be the largest exchange pool. Note: I propose to hold off with any CVP liquidity mining incentives and add rewards with another proposal if necessary. Motivation Instead of switching between different vaults and paying withdrawal fee users will have access to more stable APY and a way to switch between pools. Specification Launch an index in the PowerPool ecosystem consisting of Yearn vault tokens: 1. curve.fi/Compound LP -https://etherscan.io/address/0x629c759D1E83eFbF63d84eb3868B564d9521C129#code 2. curve.fi/3pool LP - https://etherscan.io/address/0x9cA85572E6A3EbF24dEDd195623F188735A5179f#code 3. curve.fi/mUSD LP - https://etherscan.io/address/0x0FCDAeDFb8A7DfDa2e9838564c5A1665d856AFDF#code 4. curve.fi/GUSD LP - https://etherscan.io/address/0xcC7E70A958917cCe67B4B87a8C30E6297451aE98#code 5. curve.fi/y LP - https://etherscan.io/address/0x5dbcF33D8c2E976c6b560249878e6F1491Bca25c#code 6. curve.fi/busd LP - https://etherscan.io/address/0x2994529C0652D127b7842094103715ec5299bBed#code with name "Yearn Lazy Ape Index" and token symbol "YLA". Weights of the underlying tokens will be proportional to vaults TVL. TVL can be accesed by calling `balance` function on each of the tokens. Note: token weights and token set can be changed in the future via community proposals. Reference [1] TVL: https://feel-the-yearn.app/vaults
0x0cec743b…02a7sent to0x1872b969…9261·#11,668,322·0x0bd9e474…86a087
Proposal 18: Create Yearn Lazy Ape Index Summary Launch an index in the PowerPool ecosystem consisting of Yearn vault tokens: 1. curve.fi/Compound LP -https://etherscan.io/address/0x629c759D1E83eFbF63d84eb3868B564d9521C129#code 2. curve.fi/3pool LP - https://etherscan.io/address/0x9cA85572E6A3EbF24dEDd195623F188735A5179f#code 3. curve.fi/mUSD LP - https://etherscan.io/address/0x0FCDAeDFb8A7DfDa2e9838564c5A1665d856AFDF#code 4. curve.fi/GUSD LP - https://etherscan.io/address/0xcC7E70A958917cCe67B4B87a8C30E6297451aE98#code 5. curve.fi/y LP - https://etherscan.io/address/0x5dbcF33D8c2E976c6b560249878e6F1491Bca25c#code 6. curve.fi/busd LP - https://etherscan.io/address/0x2994529C0652D127b7842094103715ec5299bBed#code Instead of using equal weights -- 16.66% -- use adaptive weights proportional to vaults TVL [1]. Proposed name "Yearn Lazy Ape Index" with token symbol "YLA". The index serves 2 purposes: - smoothen APY generated by vaults; - create liquidity sink for yTokens and effectively be the largest exchange pool. Note: I propose to hold off with any CVP liquidity mining incentives and add rewards with another proposal if necessary. Motivation Instead of switching between different vaults and paying withdrawal fee users will have access to more stable APY and a way to switch between pools. Specification Launch an index in the PowerPool ecosystem consisting of Yearn vault tokens: 1. curve.fi/Compound LP -https://etherscan.io/address/0x629c759D1E83eFbF63d84eb3868B564d9521C129#code 2. curve.fi/3pool LP - https://etherscan.io/address/0x9cA85572E6A3EbF24dEDd195623F188735A5179f#code 3. curve.fi/mUSD LP - https://etherscan.io/address/0x0FCDAeDFb8A7DfDa2e9838564c5A1665d856AFDF#code 4. curve.fi/GUSD LP - https://etherscan.io/address/0xcC7E70A958917cCe67B4B87a8C30E6297451aE98#code 5. curve.fi/y LP - https://etherscan.io/address/0x5dbcF33D8c2E976c6b560249878e6F1491Bca25c#code 6. curve.fi/busd LP - https://etherscan.io/address/0x2994529C0652D127b7842094103715ec5299bBed#code with name "Yearn Lazy Ape Index" and token symbol "YLA". Weights of the underlying tokens will be proportional to vaults TVL. TVL can be accesed by calling `balance` function on each of the tokens. Note: token weights and token set can be changed in the future via community proposals. Reference [1] TVL: https://feel-the-yearn.app/vaults
unknown sendersent to0x1872b969…9261·#11,662,179·0xe662fb89…4c2e12
Proposal 17: Creation of the ASSY index The $ASSY index is composed of AAVE, SNX, SUSHI & YFI in their staked forms. For additional information on this proposal, please refers to the governance discussion : https://gov.powerpool.finance/t/proposal-discussion-assy-index-creation/508/53
0x0c714166…ba22sent to0x1872b969…9261·#11,662,179·0xe662fb89…4c2e12
Proposal 17: Creation of the ASSY index The $ASSY index is composed of AAVE, SNX, SUSHI & YFI in their staked forms. For additional information on this proposal, please refers to the governance discussion : https://gov.powerpool.finance/t/proposal-discussion-assy-index-creation/508/53