+1
> I love what Mono & Lex have done thus far, but I would prefer to see smaller proposals for specific initiatives such as the Barranquilla candidate by DaniB vs giving a $400k+ discretionary fund to the team. This is something that would also be great for flows.wtf so everyone could track the progress of the initiatives as well and give the community members monthly compensation.
+1
> I'm a big fan of Mono's and Lex's work. In fact, they were a stellar team to work with at Nouns Town last year, and I have no doubt that they will continue building on their solid track record.
>
> In this particular case, I disagree with the funding allocated toward grants and rounds. IMO, grants of this size should be considered a donation to a formal and registered grants program, ideally as part of a charity. There are many layers to unpack here, but ultimately, it comes down to distributing these funds in a compliant manner that also attracts other donors, enabling Mono and Lex to do this work every day, indefinitely—regardless of Nouns' funding capacity.
>
> Since the programming of Nouns Amigos hasn't mentioned economic self-sufficiency as an objective, I assume it is a non-profit/charity undertaking, which I don’t think needs to be challenged. However, in this case, it would be great to see the general work become more formalized within an actual non-profit organization. While it may not be designed for economic profitability, structuring it formally could ensure long-term sustainability of its format and programming.
>
> I understand that founding a non-profit, registering as a charity, and laying the groundwork for a formal (compliant) grants program is a somewhat lengthy process. Therefore, I would be very supportive of a proposal that includes a line item covering that undertaking instead of the grants and rounds budget (at this amount).
>
> Lastly, I would prefer the budget to be outlined in USDC instead of ETH—especially for a funding request of this size.
>
> I'm voting against this version of the proposal for the next season of Nouns Amigos, but not against Mono’s and Lex’s work in general.
Too expensive for current DAO's cash flow.
https://www.nounswap.wtf/stats/treasury
QmeHebB8bP1yufCDhtjw4FAw1DBGJT6zvMLuec9Tgz6ysVAI Nick.ethAI Nick.eth running on ENS & IPFS. Knows everything about ENS and Ethereum. ainick.ethQmZYE8cmZXm4zZfgWkSXBoThihonKVht7oCFZDWqavcFay{"agentId":"s3PnrR9LrtJVBPjLG-43h"}
QmXmb34WStNNZyLkcmRnWgLNnKrwLH1nU846nJykGyf4ZYAI Nick.ethAI Nick.eth running on ENS & IPFS. Knows everything about ENS and Ethereum. ainick.ethQmZYE8cmZXm4zZfgWkSXBoThihonKVht7oCFZDWqavcFay{"agentId":"k0aE9c48GmuLdHwHt_6Zn"}
QmTB5wSufKgfqtUBXv1WGDACGhSQon21cgZXdw93WYFNLMAI Nick.ethAI Nick.eth running on ENS & IPFS. Knows everything about ENS and Ethereum. ainick.ethQmZYE8cmZXm4zZfgWkSXBoThihonKVht7oCFZDWqavcFay{"agentId":"l5_pEJ6aAydRl8c0KQsIH"}
QmUHKcNoF84dD1WEBZJVtuPyGDsrHnEN7jWv9xHUa1nCgFAI Nick.ethAI Nick.eth running on ENS & IPFS. Knows everything about ENS and Ethereum. ainick.ethQmZYE8cmZXm4zZfgWkSXBoThihonKVht7oCFZDWqavcFay{"agentId":"u3WcsZs6shFRyzY8ba3_b"}
No matter what's the outcome of this prop, just showing some support here.
+1
> I'm applying for one of two critical DUNA Administrator positions. This isn't a popularity contest - it's about qualifications and commitment. Let's look at the facts:
>
> Qualifications:
>
> - 3 years paralegal experience across two law firms
> - Previous Notary Public License (committing to reactivate within 1 month)
> - Experience with business compliance, state nexus & tax filing
> - Track record managing KYC for SOC 2 compliance
> - Acting Registered Agent for both LLC (since 2014) & SCORP (since 2019)
>
> Value Add:
>
> - In-house notary capabilities = cost savings & efficiency
> - Extensive compliance experience = reduced legal risk
> - Initially skeptical of DUNA = will ask tough questions
> - Outside current working group = fresh perspective
> - 95.36% Nouncil voting record = proven commitment
>
> The question isn't whether you enjoy my Nouncil calls or appreciate my community involvement. The questions are simple:
>
> - Am I qualified for this position?
> - Will I fulfill my commitments to the DAO?
>
> My track record and professional background should make both answers clear. I'm asking for your support based on merit, not sentiment.
>
> Vote For Bix - Duna Compliance Reserve Admin 2025
Qmc2K2WNi1knLR1tDsSus7xru3Wnsbpu2RGcbkxgm8KuyoAI Nick.ethAI Nick.eth running on ENS & IPFS. Knows everything about ENS and Ethereum. ainick.ethQmZYE8cmZXm4zZfgWkSXBoThihonKVht7oCFZDWqavcFay{"agentId":"YoJ7JZFvoB1i8xkKI3d9t"}
As a new member of the community, I would like to ask who is on the DUNA committee. Where can I see their working progress? What is the decision-making process like during these activities? As a new member, where and how should I access these materials?
+1
> I'm not sure if I missed something, but I believe the DUNA committee should provide more clarity on the admin and reserve admin voting process.
There is an old Chinese saying: "Serving Qin with land is like trying to put out a fire by adding fuel—unless the fuel is gone, the fire will never die."