0x3335cc8b…81e1sent to0x323a7639…b7e3·#25,678,251·0x4b0172ef…55f081
I am voting against this proposal because it still transfers effective control of the ENS DAO Endowment "away from the DAO", (without establishing sufficiently strong, enforceable onchain safeguards). As Avsa has said, "After execution, the DAO appears nowhere in the control chain". The proponents of this proposal explain what they intend to do, but their statements, (that "protections, disclosures, renewals, or governance measures *should* be implemented" are *not* evidence that they have "actually been implemented"). Intentions, fiduciary duties, and policies are not substitutes for "verifiable execution, separation of powers, and durable" DAO-controlled mechanisms. Until those protections are demonstrably in place, (and the DAO retains "a meaningful, enforceable ability to constrain or recover the Endowment"), I cannot (and do not see how anyone can) support this transfer of authority.