0x38e24789…26c0sent to0x408ed635…24c3·#25,608,199·0x3a66941b…d69f5a
I support Uniswap capturing sustainable value from v4, but not without clear protections for the liquidity providers on whom the protocol depends.
Before activating fees broadly, governance should establish transparent measurements of LP profitability, liquidity depth, spreads, volume, and market share, along with predefined review and rollback thresholds. Fees can then be activated selectively where the evidence shows that pools can support them without weakening Uniswap’s competitiveness.
I am voting AGAINST this implementation, not against protocol fees in principle. Build the measurement and rollback mechanism first, then activate fees responsibly.