0x547a…8ed0

All memos sent from and to 0x547a…8ed0.

As someone who has worked directly with Nick & Josh on the mintboard for Based Management, I feel a more in-depth explanation of the potential would be helpful to some on the fence about this vote. The Mintboard's intent is to provide hyperlocal content and media production with intuitive ux and generous splits built on top of protocol rewards. Why I believe this will end up mattering for Nouns, Nounish subdaos, and those that would end up inspired by Nouns is three fold: 1. Creative context onchain is highly disorganized and having a location where the inputs can remain chaotic but the output is in one hub is massive for reducing cold start friction from would be content contributors (the people who proliferate the meme) 2. The ability to give creators protocol rewards and simultaneously send a negligible amount of the reward split to dao treasuries allows for a feedback loop that enforces 'good content → good reception → good resources' -- the mintboard tries to abstract away the reality that resources are needed, and instead allows for creativity to blossom and subconsciously pool resources over time 3. There are currently no hyperlocal destinations onchain to jam on creative context and ideas. This is a simple bulletin-board-esque initial prototype that has already shown promise with it's first dao (us at Based Management) I would encourage those willing to imagine what having a Nouns board that routes rewards to the creator and the Nouns treasury simultaneously would look like - then think of the subdaos like lil nouns, gnars, etc -- this is an opportunity to distill signal and provide networking opportunities to people looking to engage with Nouns onchain. Next iterations will be related to enhancing ux, allow more configurable dao engagement/rewards for participating on boards, etc I believe this project hits the core of what public domain and being nounish means
The fundamental premise I am in favor of. I think Nouns financially bolstering the license vertical they so elegantly captured makes sense. I'm voting against however because there is no plan, budget, or common formalities provided for how the 100 Ξ is being used. It is easy to burn liquidity, and an injection of 100 Ξ with no tangible responsibilities to tie CC to is worrisome.
SynthesisYNTHESISSynthesizing the idea of collective onchain ownership of a singular painting. One painting fragmented into 1000 shares.ipfs://bafybeiapq2ujsydgfr3ympu2gpf2oujeuv2p7zt4bbv5sr6evcaidim7ym