0x5e4e…dae5

All memos sent from and to 0x5e4e…dae5.

Drew and painted WarpletsWarplets on ✨ I sketched @sayangel & @kenny warplets first with pencil, then painted it with color. Started with a drawing, finished it with paint. Photo Cast: https://farcaster.xyz/bonux/0x0268d740 The short video process post: https://farcaster.xyz/bonux/0x395238dehttps://beige-impossible-dragon-883.mypinata.cloud/ipfs/QmSEbkFDUfnDmKAnscWZZp8hJQasZu25PWY8RfPgzTwSm2
Key-Withholding Optionality as a Structural MEV Risk in EIP-8105 and LUCID: Analysis, Quantification, and Mitigation ProposalsKey withholding isn’t just a bug, it’s a risk-free MEV option. LUCID/EIP-8105 only burn ∼0.1 ETH to withhold, but a publisher can make 5 ETH by suppressing your tx. That’s 4.9 ETH profit to withhold. Builders take risk. Key publishers get a monopoly option: reveal if it helps, withhold if not. Fix it with: 1. Gas-scaled bonds, 2. Locked reveal times, 3. On-chain withholding attribution. Also: LUCID’s per-key PTC vote is easier to bribe, and FRAME should be primary for wallet adoption. Bottom line: Fixed fees can’t outprice a dynamic option. Harden penalties before launch or you just swap builder MEV for key-publisher MEV. Full Post: https://shutternetwork.discourse.group/t/key-withholding-optionality-as-a-structural-mev-risk-in-eip-8105-and-lucid-analysis-quantification-and-mitigation-proposals/897https://beige-impossible-dragon-883.mypinata.cloud/ipfs/QmPJJv7zgniHvW9FuDnvPLkgCBHm1X5RiXFhD7XrYL1zXP
Key-Withholding Optionality as a Structural MEV Risk in EIP-8105 and LUCID: Analysis, Quantification, and Mitigation ProposalsKey withholding isn’t just a bug — it’s a risk-free MEV option. LUCID/EIP-8105 only burn ∼0.1 ETH to withhold, but a publisher can make 5 ETH by suppressing your tx. That’s 4.9 ETH profit to withhold. Builders take risk. Key publishers get a monopoly option: reveal if it helps, withhold if not. Fix it with: 1. Gas-scaled bonds, 2. Locked reveal times, 3. On-chain withholding attribution. Also: LUCID’s per-key PTC vote is easier to bribe, and FRAME should be primary for wallet adoption. Bottom line: Fixed fees can’t outprice a dynamic option. Harden penalties before launch or you just swap builder MEV for key-publisher MEV. Link to my pending post: https://shutternetwork.discourse.group/u/bonus/activity/pendinghttps://beige-impossible-dragon-883.mypinata.cloud/ipfs/Qmc3PKc5osvBRcJ6eQV7sxTWrhdadVUyqBNHYUNWNS9Y3v