0xb875badb…3309sent to0x6f3e6272…223d·#25,352,292·view on Etherscan
I’ve been following this proposal, and I genuinely appreciate the vision behind it. The team’s ability to generate organic press coverage without any funding is a testament to the strength of the concept, and the CC0 template approach is a Nounish way to scale a narrative.
Buuuuuuut, I have to vote No.
My decision comes down to strict fiscal responsibility during a period where we have zero auction income. Because we have no incoming revenue, every capital allocation has a high opportunity cost and I need to be much more selective.
While this is an exciting experiment, it carries significant execution risks that I’m not comfortable with in our current treasury state. We are being asked to fund a production based on a projected 3 year run, but that timeline is not guaranteed, and neither is the 5% revenue payback to the DAO. If the production faces challenges or runs for a shorter period, the projected return could vanish entirely.
When I compare this to other proposals...even those that are similarly structured as operational rentals...I am personally prioritizing operators with a proven track record of delivery. I believe we have to be disciplined with our remaining runway, and I am choosing to keep our powder dry for projects with lower execution risk.
I’d love to see this succeed, but I cannot justify this allocation of our limited capital right now.