0xb875…3309

All memos sent from and to 0xb875…3309.

0xb875badb…3309sent to0x6f3e6272…223d2026-08-31·#25,876,640·0x0b9f0c53…47a258

the ask is fair and it should aid in proliferation. lets get this one done.

0xb875badb…3309sent to0x6f3e6272…223d2026-08-25·#25,834,785·0x6d640c27…011182

seems like an interesting way to onboard some people.

0xb875badb…3309sent to0xf790a5f5…13652026-08-23·#25,820,017·0xa62d93c5…b65e77

fey---trade-with-superpowers@0xc6a3...96E4 I love you too ❤️ > @0xB875...3309 > > lol'ing reading this, so confidently incorrect about the entire premise while I'm sitting on a positive mid-5 figure PnL from a hyper liquid trading agent I developed 5 months ago > > "dilute the rest of us." you've never bought a noun or contributed to the DAO in such a way that you've been gifted one, who is the us you're talking about here? > > when we need an opinion on being broke and shoving hot dogs down our throat, we'll ask bro. until then just put the fries in the bag > > > > > > > I’m against this $360k ask. While Wiz and Sam have history in Nouns, the structure, tech premise, and risk profile of this proposal are bad deals for the DAO. > > > > The proposal promises 30% of trading fees to buy up to $540k of Nouns at auction. That isn't paying back the treasury. They take $360,000 of our liquid funds to build a private business, and then use platform fees to buy Nouns accumulating governance power for themselves while diluting the rest of us. If this were a real payback, the USDC/ETH would go back directly to the treasury, not into buying them more votes. > > > > LLMs do not think nor do they understand real time market liquidity or macro risk. They are probabilistic next token predictors. Expecting an LLM to buy the selloff, not a falling knife by reading charts and news in a prompt window will lead to hallucinated trade setups and wrecked user portfolios. Calling raw LLM outputs trading superpowers encourages retail users to risk real capital on statistical text predictions, which creates massive reputational risk for Nouns when trades go south. > > > > They explicitly state they are not providing a fixed budget line item for this $360k ask, it's essentially a blank check for startup runway. Furthermore, building automated AI trading tools for perps and prediction markets without regulatory registration puts severe legal exposure on the DAO. > > > > We’ve seen prior treasury allocations dead end without generating sustainable revenue for the DAO(see Federation https://nouns.wtf/vote/229). We shouldn't be handing over $360k in unitemized cash for an unsafe tech premise with a repayment model that just buys the founders more votes. > > > >

0xb875badb…3309sent to0xf790a5f5…13652026-08-23·#25,819,323·0x0c429de4…ba2d56

fey---trade-with-superpowers I’m against this $360k ask. While Wiz and Sam have history in Nouns, the structure, tech premise, and risk profile of this proposal are bad deals for the DAO. The proposal promises 30% of trading fees to buy up to $540k of Nouns at auction. That isn't paying back the treasury. They take $360,000 of our liquid funds to build a private business, and then use platform fees to buy Nouns accumulating governance power for themselves while diluting the rest of us. If this were a real payback, the USDC/ETH would go back directly to the treasury, not into buying them more votes. LLMs do not think nor do they understand real time market liquidity or macro risk. They are probabilistic next token predictors. Expecting an LLM to buy the selloff, not a falling knife by reading charts and news in a prompt window will lead to hallucinated trade setups and wrecked user portfolios. Calling raw LLM outputs trading superpowers encourages retail users to risk real capital on statistical text predictions, which creates massive reputational risk for Nouns when trades go south. They explicitly state they are not providing a fixed budget line item for this $360k ask, it's essentially a blank check for startup runway. Furthermore, building automated AI trading tools for perps and prediction markets without regulatory registration puts severe legal exposure on the DAO. We’ve seen prior treasury allocations dead end without generating sustainable revenue for the DAO(see Federation https://nouns.wtf/vote/229). We shouldn't be handing over $360k in unitemized cash for an unsafe tech premise with a repayment model that just buys the founders more votes.

0xb875badb…3309sent to0x6f3e6272…223d2026-08-17·#25,776,866·0xc7121294…0e6f48

yield is our only source of income at this point so we might as well put as much money to use as possible.

0xb875badb…3309sent to0xf790a5f5…13652026-08-03·#25,676,640·0xb3d992f8…5652e1

nouns-scooterLooks like a good time.

0xb875badb…3309sent to0x5d2c31ce…40392026-07-27·#25,620,639·0xbc753cfe…52d11c

Do good with no expectation of return -4156

0xb875badb…3309sent to0xf790a5f5…13652026-07-22·#25,591,207·0x7cbc0a01…a77e68

--noggles-make-history-the-biggest-planting-day-ever-attemptedA proven buildoor, with a good track record of delivering on his promises.

0xb875badb…3309sent to0x5d2c31ce…40392026-07-15·#25,539,073·0xb4a0c577…ae469b

I cannot vote on my own proposal, that would be crazy. Thinking I would rug is even crazier though. Pass or not pass, I will still win the contest. Keep Lil Nouns weird or don't. The choice is yours.

0xb875badb…3309sent to0x5d2c31ce…40392026-07-15·#25,538,959·0x4ab92e2a…ec3a0b

+1 > Fun idea, but not super unique or anything I think will go viral after seeing many similar pages on IG where they drive cars to feed stray cats. Whats the unique angle here for Lils to promote? > > Leaning no for a few reasons: > > 1. How will lil's be represented? It's unclear.. Named and tagging @lilnouners on the socials? How will a logo on the front of the car be captured by the video? -- Shouldn't it be facing the camera? Will these groups add us to their bio or a webpage that will be long lasting? Where do they promote the other groups funding these initiatives (how do they raise funds in general?)? > > 2. I mentioned to you in DMs that we have an outstanding project with Lil Nick right to place feeders for strays. It's not complete yet and I think because of that Lils should wait to see how that plays out before we fund more of the same type of initiative. (I get thats not your problem, but when thinking about the general DAO is whats good for the overall group; this is my personal opinion). > > While food runs out, the feeders last and allow the community to fill them, themselves.. which i think is more sustainable model for how lils can contribute to such a large problem.. (12-13 million stray cats and dogs in the Philippines?!)... > > 3. Feels like feeding them, without spaying or neutering is only adding to the problem, no? I get education is key -- But if locals aren't able/willing to feed them, why would they trap and neuter them? Feels like we're growing the problem in a sense with nothing more than 'education.' > > 4. This is a nice little charity project but IMO sadly lil's don't have the funds to support straight charity anymore without some form of SOLID proliferation model mixed in or long lasting content lils can point back to with defined outcome, etc. -- This feels unclear from the current proposal > > Regardless, good luck and thanks for bringing ideas to Lils <3 Lil Feeders is feeding cats without spaying or neutering them either. This money goes to fund buying cat food directly, and will get us a little bit of content for the twitter account since it is currently dead. This has more chance of proliferation IMO than the feeders, and I know this will be delivered in a timely manner since the complexity is much lower.

0xb875badb…3309sent to0x8d59e106…29022026-07-13·#25,524,253·0x6d7be09c…8b68f9

forgot to mention, will be launching a Youtube channel along with this to review hotdogs on a regular basis. I secured the email LilHotdoggers and LilHotdogReviews will be the channel.....right now there are no hotdog specific youtube channels, so might be able to get that niche. Thank you for your consideration.

0xb875badb…3309sent to0x5d2c31ce…40392026-07-13·#25,524,011·0x6e4fc094…587925

# Lil Nouns Summer Gluttony Protocol ⌐◨-◨ # 🌭 **TLDR:** Sponsoring a decorated champion to execute a 420 hotdog marathon on logadog.xyz from now until Labor Day (Sept 7th), delivering daily branded content, official Lil Hotdog trait watermarks, and relentless proof of work on X and Farcaster --- ## 🏆 The Track Record (Proof of Athletic Capability) This is not a casual attempt. I am a seasoned competitor in the Log A Dog circuit: - **Year 1:** 🥇 1st Place Champion — Watch my official winner's interview on [Zora](https://zora.co/coin/base:0xee78b6b03a705e9bd926b5c515a913c0bda39078?referrer=0x653ff253b0c7c1cc52f484e891b71f9f1f010bfb). - **Year 2 (Last Year):** 🥉 3rd Place Finisher This year, I am returning to the arena not just to compete, but to immortalize the noggles by logging exactly **420 hotdogs** before the final holiday of summer --- ## 🗓️ The Summer Grind Math The contest wraps up on Labor Day (September 7th). Since today is July 10th, I have exactly **59 days** from today to hit the milestone. - **The Pace:** \~8 hotdogs per day - **The Strategy:** A sustained, high protein summer saga of daily content rather than a single chaotic weekend --- ## 📸 Proof of Work & Media Deliverables Every single day, the grind will be documented with strict branding parameters: 1. **The Uniform:** I will be wearing a Lil Nouns shirt in the daily media updates 2. **The OnChain Tracker Watermark:** Every photo uploaded to logadog.xyz and blasted on socials will feature a custom overlay utilizing the official **Lil Nouns Hotdog Head Trait** asset and a running total of what # dog I am on 3. **Social Media Distribution:** Daily updates will be pushed directly to Twitter/X and Farcaster to keep the DAO fueled with content --- ## 💰 The Logistics & Infrastructure Ask To ensure longevity over a 2 month period, I am opting for quality uncured franks and matching buns from Walmart, built on a perfectly optimized 8 pack model: - **53 Packs of Uncured Hot Dogs** (8ct packs @ $6.25/each): \~$332 - **53 Packs of Hot Dog Buns** (8ct packs @ $1.99/each): \~$106 - **Toppings Budget** (Condiments, relish, and extras): $62.00 - **Total Funding Request:** \*\* $500 USDC --- > **VOTE FOR:** Put premium fuel in a proven champion, secure 60 straight days of noggle branded content, and let's log some dogs for the culture ⌐◨-◨

0xb875badb…3309sent to0x8d59e106…29022026-07-10·#25,503,336·0x800b686f…403a28

0xb875badb…3309sent to0x6f3e6272…223d2026-07-09·#25,496,488·0x7324cfb2…8e17e0

Honestly I think there is work that needs to be done to improve the vote quality of Nouncil.

0xb875badb…3309sent to0x6f3e6272…223d2026-07-06·#25,476,124·0x28021b3a…5bae3d

when we label firing someone as "mistreating" them, we are no longer trying to govern, we are playing politics. politics ruins daos; good governance saves them. to date, no one has provided a logical argument for keeping the reserve duna admin. Stripymofo makes a valid point that giving them lead time to transition and find other income sources is a fairer approach, and i agree with that compromise. however, we need to look at the explicit reality of the role as defined in our bylaws under section (b): it is strictly an alternate role....subsection (i) states the reserve serves "during periods that the compliance administrator is unavailable." if the main admin is available, the reserve has no daily operational duties. it is reactive, not proactive....subsection (ii) notes the reserve advises "upon a compliance administrator’s request." they are a "just in case" resource, not a co-admin. this is not a full time or even part time operational job, it is an on call backup position. keeping someone on a retainer for an active role that the bylaws explicitly state shouldn't exist is bad governance. next year's elections must reflect this reality. if a main admin candidate feels uncomfortable handling the role solo, they should not apply. moving forward, we should look into hiring a 3rd party company to handle this function so the dao can view these operations objectively, rather than personally.

0xb875badb…3309sent to0xf790a5f5…13652026-07-04·#25,455,859·0x98bce1af…2c373f

@0xc6a3...96E4 This proposal is a straightforward governance optimization regarding the backup DUNA admin role. It is not personal, nor is it a vendetta. All of the information presented in this proposal is factual and not based on opinion. Please feel free to read it objectively and then let me know if you find any faults with the logic. Let the merits of the architecture dictate the vote. > it's inappropriate at best for a proposal of this nature to be put onchain given the proposer showed up in the past few months and is not a token-holder with skin in the game > > I've also personally been witness to and heard several accounts of the proposer/ sponsor and the groups they participate in slandering Satori's character, calling him a bitch and other names > > the proposal seems to be a personal vendetta of the sponsor, enacted through a third party by a particular biased context presented on hours-long Discord calls > > there are number of factors hurting Nouns as outlined in the Nouns is Dead candidate. some of it is the protocol design itself, some is the inability or unwillingness of large holders to coordinate with each other and with smaller token holders. > > the culture Lil Nouns & Nouncil have developed of viciously attacking anyone who doesn't spend 40 hours per week with them on Discord calls mocking other people, hating on large token holders and accusing anyone who is willing to work with them of being a grifter or extractor, accusing anyone who requests treasury funds for a new initiative of being an extractor despite these same people having been funded themselves several times over by Nouns and its subDAOs, is by far the most deleterious to the DAO and its members > > rather than taking action to innovate, create win-wins, and create new value, the rest of us are instead presented with impotent protest and facsimiles of action that either have no chance of passing before ever going onchain or are actively seeking to leverage the DAO to hurt other DAO members > > they say misery loves company, and unfortunately this group continues to try dragging the rest of us into their misery with them. > > --- > > "Sentiment is low, morale is lower, and the forums and calls that once felt like a shared project increasingly feel like a battlefield. > > Many long-time smaller holders now decline to engage at all with the newest cohort of large holders — and, in the experience of a great many contributors, those who do try to engage across that line, or who simply take an unpopular position, are met with pile-ons and personal attacks rather than argument. > > Some of the sharpest of that hostility has come from within organized blocs — Lil Nouners and Nouncil among them — and its effect has been an exodus of exactly the thoughtful, good-faith participants a healthy DAO most needs. This is the human mechanism behind the "small, fatigued core" above: it is not only that governance is tiring, it is that being here has become unpleasant, and enough capable people have concluded it is not worth the abuse. > > A DAO can, in principle, redesign a quorum or a reserve price; it cannot legislate its way back to trust once the culture has curdled this far."

0xb875badb…3309sent to0x5d2c31ce…40392026-07-03·#25,448,331·0x8a1d5925…9f35a6

I would love to see this group focus on building more surfboards and making content around that. My full opinion is in the discord and on the previous prop.

0xb875badb…3309sent to0x6f3e6272…223d2026-07-02·#25,446,532·0xe47fbd36…b9f077

# Termination of Secondary DUNA Administration Services This proposal seeks to terminate the engagement of the secondary ("backup") DUNA administrator. Following a review of current DAO operations, activity levels, and fiscal requirements, it has been determined that maintaining a redundant administrative layer is unnecessary and represents an inefficient use of the Nouns DAO treasury. ### Motivation Nouns DAO currently retains two DUNA administrators. While redundant support was initially envisioned as a safeguard, the current operational state of the DAO does not necessitate dual admin coverage. - **Operational Requirements:** Current governance activity and proposal throughput are at levels that are fully managed by a single administrator. - **Fiscal Prudence:** The secondary admin incurs an annual cost of $60,000 USD. Given that Nouns DAO is currently experiencing a period of low auction activity...exacerbated by existing reserve price constraints...it is the responsibility of the community to eliminate non essential outflows. - **Alignment:** Capital preservation is critical during market downturns or periods of low treasury velocity. Removing this redundant expense aligns the DAO’s spending with its current operational reality. ### Specification - **Termination:** The contract/agreement with Satori shall be terminated effective immediately - **Payment Cessation:** All recurring payments to Satori shall cease upon the effective date of termination. - **Governance:** The primary DUNA administrator will remain as the sole point of contact for administrative, compliance, and regulatory filing requirements for the Nouns DUNA. ### Financial Impact - **Immediate Savings:** $39,500 USD from the remaining money in the contract - **Treasury Impact:** This move improves the DAO’s runway by reducing fixed overhead costs that provide no marginal utility under the current cadence of governance.

0xb875badb…3309sent to0x6f3e6272…223d2026-06-27·#25,412,021·0x95c5b91e…aeeb38

Against. The $100–$150/hr ask scales to a rate that exceeds the DAO's yearly expected revenue under our 60 day auction cycle. To protect the treasury, labor costs must be adjusted to match our actual inbound cash flow.

0xb875badb…3309sent to0x6f3e6272…223d2026-06-19·#25,352,292·0x00e7bdd5…b00b92

I’ve been following this proposal, and I genuinely appreciate the vision behind it. The team’s ability to generate organic press coverage without any funding is a testament to the strength of the concept, and the CC0 template approach is a Nounish way to scale a narrative. Buuuuuuut, I have to vote No. My decision comes down to strict fiscal responsibility during a period where we have zero auction income. Because we have no incoming revenue, every capital allocation has a high opportunity cost and I need to be much more selective. While this is an exciting experiment, it carries significant execution risks that I’m not comfortable with in our current treasury state. We are being asked to fund a production based on a projected 3 year run, but that timeline is not guaranteed, and neither is the 5% revenue payback to the DAO. If the production faces challenges or runs for a shorter period, the projected return could vanish entirely. When I compare this to other proposals...even those that are similarly structured as operational rentals...I am personally prioritizing operators with a proven track record of delivery. I believe we have to be disciplined with our remaining runway, and I am choosing to keep our powder dry for projects with lower execution risk. I’d love to see this succeed, but I cannot justify this allocation of our limited capital right now.

0xb875badb…3309sent to0xf790a5f5…13652026-06-19·#25,352,118·0xef68ba8e…ad3be3

-clubhouse-chapter-1 Personally, I am excited to see this proposal hit the chain. The work you’ve done with past Nouns initiatives, and the fact that you have a proven track record...especially the transparency in returning unspent funds...gives me a lot of confidence in this ask. I’m a big fan of the vision here. The idea of creating a permanent, physical hub for Nouns in Portugal is exactly the kind of unique, long term proliferation we should be aiming for. I love that this is structured as a one year ask to build a self sufficient asset...the goal of having this run forever is exactly what the DAO needs to see more of. The event formats you’ve outlined, especially Sip n Swing and the movie nights, feel like they’ll hit the right balance of accessible and engaging to get people in the door. 2 events I would likely attend monthly myself if I didn't live thousands of miles away. When I first saw the location at a golf course, I was initially concerned about the demographic fit. However, knowing you live in the area and are deeply tied into that specific community, I trust your judgment on the ground to navigate it successfully. The budget makes a lot of sense, and I’m looking forward to seeing how this evolves into a permanent fixture.

0xb875badb…3309sent to0x5d2c31ce…40392026-06-16·#25,330,744·0x6454e45d…e437a1

While i like the idea I'd much rather see the contest happen natively on our own website vs building out another website further fragmenting the community and activities it sponsors.

0xb875badb…3309sent to0x5d2c31ce…40392026-06-14·#25,318,299·0x41f7cfc7…473246

I like the idea but....my main concern here is the lack of scalable impact relative to the cost. With only 1 surfboard, 5 pairs of sandals, 5 pairs of sunglasses and 100 bars of soap, the physical reach is highly limited. Furthermore, we haven't seen a meaningful uptick in brand awareness or data proving success from the original Nogglesboard proposal(show me the numbers!), which still has outstanding deliverables. Before funding a 10 month extension into Lil Nouns, we should see the finalized metrics, distribution data, and full delivery of the original Nouns DAO project IMO. I was told that the main objective is the prop is "multimedia" for Lil Nouns to be able to distribute and share. We currently don't have much in the way of social media presence and looking at their youtube channel there isnt any meaningful views for me too see it as being a good treasury spend. I mentioned this in the discord in more detail. feel free to check the general chat.

0xb875badb…3309sent to0xf790a5f5…13652026-06-13·#25,309,599·0xb230eb64…0aece2

termination-of-secondary-duna-administration-services@0xae47...5Fed There was 97 voters against and it only passed because it was forced through by 5gram and Dusk. Without them it would not have reached quorum and the difference between for and against would have been less than 10 votes. > > > yep and i voted against the original reserve admin proposal with 7 nouns... just wondering if anyone besides me had determined this, but if its just me thats cool too gl > > +1 > > > @0xae47...5Fed > > > > Cool, I'm glad we agree on this point. Your input is much appreciated. Logically this means you too have determined that this is an unnecessary and inefficient use of the Nouns treasury. By whom? You ser. > > > > > > > > > > > no, but "it has been determined that maintaining a redundant administrative layer is unnecessary and represents an inefficient use of the Nouns DAO treasury." > > > > > > it has been determined by whom? the treasury would like names. > > > > > > +1 > > > > > > > @0xae47...5Fed > > > > > > > > Do you honesty find that having a second DUNA admin is currently a benefit and not just a waste of money? I'd love to know your reasoning. We have basically 0 income at the moment. The admins are not so busy that 1 person could not handle the workload. This is all in the candidate. I think I explained my opinion well. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > "it has been determined that maintaining a redundant administrative layer is unnecessary and represents an inefficient use of the Nouns DAO treasury." > > > > > > > > > > it has been determined by whom? the treasury would like names. > > > > >

0xb875badb…3309sent to0xf790a5f5…13652026-06-13·#25,305,792·0x0a8494a2…fbe3ec

termination-of-secondary-duna-administration-services@0xae47...5Fed Cool, I'm glad we agree on this point. Your input is much appreciated. Logically this means you too have determined that this is an unnecessary and inefficient use of the Nouns treasury. By whom? You ser. > > > no, but "it has been determined that maintaining a redundant administrative layer is unnecessary and represents an inefficient use of the Nouns DAO treasury." > > it has been determined by whom? the treasury would like names. > > +1 > > > @0xae47...5Fed > > > > Do you honesty find that having a second DUNA admin is currently a benefit and not just a waste of money? I'd love to know your reasoning. We have basically 0 income at the moment. The admins are not so busy that 1 person could not handle the workload. This is all in the candidate. I think I explained my opinion well. > > > > > > > > > > > "it has been determined that maintaining a redundant administrative layer is unnecessary and represents an inefficient use of the Nouns DAO treasury." > > > > > > it has been determined by whom? the treasury would like names. > > >

0xb875badb…3309sent to0xf790a5f5…13652026-06-13·#25,304,959·0x6716a4ab…8d9f05

termination-of-secondary-duna-administration-services@0xae47...5Fed Do you honesty find that having a second DUNA admin is currently a benefit and not just a waste of money? I'd love to know your reasoning. We have basically 0 income at the moment. The admins are not so busy that 1 person could not handle the workload. This is all in the candidate. I think I explained my opinion well. > > > "it has been determined that maintaining a redundant administrative layer is unnecessary and represents an inefficient use of the Nouns DAO treasury." > > it has been determined by whom? the treasury would like names. >

0xb875badb…3309sent to0xf790a5f5…13652026-06-12·#25,303,939·0xd09f6ec0…302516

0xb875badb…3309sent to0xf790a5f5…13652026-06-12·#25,303,924·0xc7d2e6ad…c01e1a

# Termination of Secondary DUNA Administration Services This proposal seeks to terminate the engagement of the secondary ("backup") DUNA administrator. Following a review of current DAO operations, activity levels, and fiscal requirements, it has been determined that maintaining a redundant administrative layer is unnecessary and represents an inefficient use of the Nouns DAO treasury. ### Motivation Nouns DAO currently retains two DUNA administrators. While redundant support was initially envisioned as a safeguard, the current operational state of the DAO does not necessitate dual admin coverage. - **Operational Requirements:** Current governance activity and proposal throughput are at levels that are fully managed by a single administrator. - **Fiscal Prudence:** The secondary admin incurs an annual cost of $60,000 USD. Given that Nouns DAO is currently experiencing a period of low auction activity...exacerbated by existing reserve price constraints...it is the responsibility of the community to eliminate non essential outflows. - **Alignment:** Capital preservation is critical during market downturns or periods of low treasury velocity. Removing this redundant expense aligns the DAO’s spending with its current operational reality. ### Specification - **Termination:** The contract/agreement with Satori shall be terminated effectively immediately - **Payment Cessation:** All recurring payments to Satori shall cease upon the effective date of termination. - **Governance:** The primary DUNA administrator will remain as the sole point of contact for administrative, compliance, and regulatory filing requirements for the Nouns DUNA. ### Financial Impact - **Immediate Savings:** $39,500 USD from the remaining money in the contract - **Treasury Impact:** This move improves the DAO’s runway by reducing fixed overhead costs that provide no marginal utility under the current cadence of governance.termination-of-secondary-duna-administration-services

0xb875badb…3309sent to0xf790a5f5…13652026-06-12·#25,303,607·0xe5af2df3…47d81d

nouns-foundation-inc I am vehemently against this proposal due to significant concerns about conflicts of interest, a lack of transparency, and the track record of the leadership team. The proposer was already paid by the DAO to research the feasibility of forming a 501c3. It is a major governance issue for the person who performed the research to now request that the DAO fund them to lead the resulting entity. We have not been provided with the results of that research, and the DAO should have had the chance to review the findings and hold a competitive process to choose the best operator rather than defaulting to the researcher. Furthermore, the track record of the individuals involved raises serious questions about their professional judgment and past operational performance. Specifically, the recent situation involving FoodNouns and the dissolution of his past non profit efforts make me question whether the treasury is in safe hands. Finally, I do not agree with the claim that this is a treasury neutral move. Redirecting a long term commitment from an established charitable pool to a new, unproven entity under the direct control of the proposer is a significant strategic shift. This proposal feels like a cash grab rather than a well vetted initiative for the DAO. I believe we should reject this and demand a more transparent and competitive process for any future foundation efforts.

0xb875badb…3309sent to0x00000000…8a482026-06-05·#25,254,546·0xc735eb81…811345

this is just a test housethis is just a test of onchain transactionshttps://lilnouns.wtf/static/media/logo.5db03da1.svg

0xb875badb…3309sent to0xbac92337…253a2026-06-04·#25,246,079·0xd8542c77…bcb94e

I know Fatty will deliver an excellent 3d model, ready for production.

0xb875badb…3309sent to0x6f3e6272…223d2026-06-03·#25,233,397·0x241b29c3…e12452

0 reserve = open access

0xb875badb…3309sent to0xf790a5f5…13652026-05-31·#25,216,800·0x0a6c12fc…41de92

Voting AGAINST. Secret ballots remove public accountability for delegates and open the door to trustless vote buying via ZK proofs. Furthermore, the public, gamified nature of the daily auction is core to the Nouns brand...sealed bids kill the spectacle. We should not fund a 111 stETH + 1 Noun infrastructure investment for unlaunched tech to fix pathologies that are actually core features of our open social layer.

0xb875badb…3309sent to0x6f3e6272…223d2026-05-30·#25,209,457·0xf7d1708e…13f55a

# Make Nouns Bid Again! The daily auction has been dead for a month, and letting Nouns stack up in the treasury like a digital attic collecting dust is a total waste. A Noun sitting in a vault does nothing....it doesn’t vote, it doesn't propose, and it doesn't bring fresh perspective to the DAO. We need active humans holding these keys, not a smart contract. The core thesis of Nouns is _"One Noun, every day, forever"_ but right now our daily ritual is totally stalled. By dropping the reserve price back to **0 ETH**, we remove the artificial barrier and let the market discover the actual fair value. Even a low priced Noun in the hands of an eager builder is worth infinitely more to the ecosystem than a Noun locked away in a treasury junkyard. Set the reserve to 0 ETH, unpause the vibes, and get back to selling!

0xb875badb…3309sent to0xf790a5f5…13652026-05-29·#25,202,033·0xf203128c…cf4412

make-nouns-bid-again-

0xb875badb…3309sent to0xf790a5f5…13652026-05-27·#25,188,946·0x3e97ab18…9884d5

0xb875badb…3309sent to0xf790a5f5…13652026-05-27·#25,188,809·0x3c94330b…3f0696

0xb875badb…3309sent to0xf790a5f5…13652026-05-27·#25,188,521·0x7e074fe5…fc409c

0xb875badb…3309sent to0xf790a5f5…13652026-05-27·#25,188,490·0x19b9d998…f922b8

0xb875badb…3309sent to0xf790a5f5…13652026-05-26·#25,181,179·0xb8f7006c…baed9c

noun-city You mentioned your first experiment was Casters on Farcaster. Given that active user retention is the biggest hurdle for Web3 interactive fiction, what were the specific DAU and retention metrics for Casters? What did you identify there that makes you confident Noun City won't suffer from low adoption? Web3 is littered with dead metaverses and text based narrative experiments that struggled to maintain a player base past week one....beyond a one time Creathon event, what is your concrete distribution and growth loop strategy to get non Noun holders to show up and play this daily? The proposal highlights "space fees" and "rent" as a sustainability path. However, for a digital storefront to be viable, it needs consistent foot traffic. If the player base remains small, the economic incentive for holders to build spaces disappears. Why fund the infrastructure for an economic layer before proving there is even consumer demand for the underlying text based game? You've allocated 10% of the budget ($3,000) for Claude API calls to power Noggle over 6 months. If the platform actually achieves high daily participation and API costs scale linearly with usage....$3,000 won't last 6 months.... if it fails, the money is wasted. What happens to Noggle’s uptime when that $3,000 cap is hit? Is there a local/open-source backup plan, or will it require another prop to fund it for longer?

0xb875badb…3309sent to0xf790a5f5…13652026-05-26·#25,181,094·0xbaf10e19…f9c82f

europe-v2-mone66ln I like the idea overall. Would this make more sense as a tie in with the Gnars crew somehow? They are active in the surf scene already.

0xb875badb…3309sent to0xf790a5f5…13652026-05-26·#25,181,069·0xd2a443bf…1cbc89

delegate-treasury-nouns-to-nouncileth FOR ⌐◨-◨ ...This is a no-brainer for activating dead treasury capital. By delegating our idle $ENS meta governance tokens to Nouncil, we put Nouns' dormant ecosystem voice to work with zero financial or operational overhead. It leverages an established, non compensated body that already meets weekly, and the 69% participation tracking bot ensures our protocol power is wielded by an active, high signal collective.

0xb875badb…3309sent to0x6f3e6272…223d2026-05-26·#25,181,035·0x1dfd698c…ae5dc4

Agree with Benjamin on this one......I would love to see more original content vs just reposts(reposts too of course), even if that means asking for more $. I would also like to get the metrics of how the engagement/visibility/follower count has increased over time since this is funding round #3.

0xb875badb…3309sent to0x6f3e6272…223d2026-05-21·#25,145,553·0xbef81e08…fbd6bb

solve the problem and do not just treat the symptom.

0xb875badb…3309sent to0x6f3e6272…223d2026-05-21·#25,145,539·0x205d5dac…e3b440

the only correct answer is FOR ><

0xb875badb…3309sent to0xf790a5f5…13652026-05-17·#25,116,159·0x8d197f68…e5f0e7

While I understand the desire to address the issue of no bid days, routing unsold Nouns to the treasury is a cosmetic fix to a structural problem. I am voting against this upgrade because it treats a symptom while sweeping the actual disease under the rug. An unsold Noun is a direct signal that our current mechanics are misaligned with market reality. Stashing these Nouns in the treasury feels like a mechanism to soften the blow and make ourselves feel better, rather than fixing what is actually broken. The real issue here is the reserve price, not the burn mechanism itself. The reason we are seeing unsold Nouns is because our artificial reserve price is choking out natural market demand. I have put forward a separate proposal to return the reserve to 0. By allowing the market to organically price a Noun every single day, we eliminate the gridlock. If we fix the pricing mechanism, Nouns will find their natural buyers, auctions will clear, and the no bid dilemma solves itself. Passing unsold Nouns in the treasury is just a distraction from this actual structural fix. The daily burn acts as a stark, unignorable reminder of where the DAO stands. When a Noun burns, it is gone forever. It hurts, and it should. That permanent loss of supply forces us to look in the mirror and realize we need to do better.... whether that means improving our culture, funding higher impact ideas, or fixing our economic parameters like the floor price. The core argument is that keeping Nouns gives us options to auction or grant them later. But optionality often breeds procrastination. Moving unsold Nouns to the treasury simply kicks the problem down the road, inflating our asset count while diluting the urgency to fix the underlying issues driving the lack of bids. This proposal frames burning as destroying assets unilaterally. I view it as maintaining protocol level accountability. We shouldn’t implement a feel good safety net just because a burn day makes us uncomfortable. Let the burn remain as a forcing function for the DAO to strive for excellence. Reject this band aid, fix the actual root cause by lowering the reserve price to 0, and let the market work the way Nouns was intended to work.

0xb875badb…3309sent to0x6f3e6272…223d2026-05-16·#25,107,880·0x8c7a52a7…504179

# Resume the Proliferation: 0 ETH Reserve The daily auction is the heartbeat of Nouns, and right now, it’s basically stopped. We’ve gone over two weeks without a single sale, which means the whole "one Noun every day" thing is currently on pause. While the reserve price was meant to protect the value of the DAO, the reality is that a high floor doesn't matter if nobody is buying. We aren't even breaking even at this point because zero sales means zero revenue for the treasury. Beyond the financials, we’re losing our momentum. The protocol is built on the idea that every 24 hours, someone new is given the opportunity to join the club and help us grow. When auctions don't clear, that growth just stalls out. We need to get back to basics and let the market decide what a Noun is worth instead of trying to force a price that isn't working. The plan is simple: let’s put the auction reserve back to 0 ETH. This guarantees that a Noun actually settles every day. It keeps the treasury moving...because some ETH is always better than no ETH...and it opens the door back up for builders and new members who want to get involved but are currently sidelined. Let’s just turn the lights back on and get the auctions moving again.

0xb875badb…3309sent to0xf790a5f5…13652026-05-14·#25,089,845·0xba63e903…810a4a

0xb875badb…3309sent to0x6f3e6272…223d2026-05-13·#25,087,879·0xb39488c5…dc45e3

This is still the Lil Nouns design, just with Nouns.wtf on it, and there has been no change to the .wtf on the playground image. Would like to see this updated to reflect Nouns.

0xb875badb…3309sent to0x6f3e6272…223d2026-05-13·#25,087,873·0xbed26dc2…992fe1

Free for free? Sure, why not.

1-50 of 85