0xb2b7d66b…5e9dsent to0x6f3e6272…223d·#22,234,013·view on Etherscan
I'm in Flows so I will abstain.
Flows is great, but it ended up creating a dynamic where grantees started seeing each other as competitors. This change could help us collaborate more as a community and stop viewing others as rivals.
I agree with some of the points made here. Maybe having clearer directions toward shared goals, instead of too many independent Flows.
As JP said, Flows brought the spirit of Prop House and became a gateway into the ecosystem.
+1
> I believe in the potential of Flows, but right now it feels unfocused and difficult to rally around.
>
> Many grants either fund things people were already doing or they lack clear follow-through (not to mention the rugs). I’ve tried coordinating with grantees, and even getting the bare minimum of engagement has been challenging.
>
> What is the goal of Flows? What are we actually working toward? We need clear, centralized goals that leverage decentralized tools to coordinate decentralized communities. All in service of building the Nouns brand.
>
> I want a smaller budget version of this proposal. Less funding per month to grantees and more focused goals from the Flows team.