0x9e0e9d25…57b1sent to0xf790a5f5…1365·#23,983,372·view on Etherscan
wylin-for-reserve-admin-mizklrrf
I am increasingly worried that we are pretending the reserve admin role is necessary. There is **zero evidence** that this role was needed at any point in the past year, yet we somehow kept paying a premium for it; it feels like we have been **burning money on a function that never actually served a purpose**.
My concerns grow when I look at the broader pattern. You are representing someone, or possibly an organization, who quietly extracted **the maximum possible value from the DAO during the forks**. With those same funds, they have **accumulated votes**, **built significant voting power**, and consistently **pushed DUNA forward**, a structure that conveniently shifts **their obligations from the forks back onto the DAO**. It is difficult not to notice how neatly all of this aligns in their favor.
I am also concerned about the quality of information provided during the DUNA discussions. Some of it was **misleading**, especially around the topic of 501c3 status. You and your benefactor claimed a certain level of **experience and familiarity** with nonprofits and charities, yet the fact that **charity status and decentralization cannot legally coexist under US law** somehow never appeared in your explanations. That omission does not look accidental to anyone paying attention.
Then there is the historical pattern of proposals that only passed because **the votes you represent** arrived exactly when needed. At this point it feels less like governance and more like watching a stage play where the same character walks in whenever the plot requires a convenient nudge.
As a member who genuinely cares about the health of this DAO, I find these patterns troubling.