0x0ed5dc3a…4277sent to0x6f3e6272…223d·#24,862,786·view on Etherscan
Anyway… Why are you only answering non-related issues, mostly about the Pope?
Curious to hear your honest feedback on my prev answer to your 1st1 comment. That is relevant to this prop, not other nonsense stuff that distract voters from the real value points. I mean, let's not mirror the same shit going on with seasoned politicians.
And, let's be honest, is this potentially good for Nouns or not?
In my first comment you have a clear breakdown of the value, and I renew my openess to discuss this in a constructive way.
Voting against is your right, and I welcome criticism to understand where to improve. But it must have a reason, otherwise it's just sterile and toxic obstructionism.
+1
> @0x073f...2e63
>
> You found offense where none was intended.
>
> >
> >
> > Mocking the Pope isn't 'Nounish' it's just disrespectful. He's the spiritual leader for over a billion Catholics. We can aim higher without cheap shots at someone's faith. Do better.
> >
> > +1
> >
> > > What I heard on a recent call makes it sound like most people don't like nouns and the people who hold them, so why would we pay for everyone at a party to say bad things about us?
> > >
> > > Aim higher. When in Rome!
> > > Persuade the Pope to either bid or become a holder. Something Nounish!