0x560ddbb5…79e6sent to0xf790a5f5…1365·#25,496,329·view on Etherscan
@0xFC53...6183
you complained extensively about a group of whales taking over the DAO. why would we make Nouncil, a group of non-holders with no stake, the greatest of the whales, controlling voting and taking over the treasury?
>
>
> LOL -- thanks for showing up, gang ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
>
> +1
>
> > lol
> >
> > +1
> >
> > > Nouncil's primary delegate is the same person as Shwoundation's, a whale buyer who outbid fork arbitragers & anons
> > >
> > > Nouncil voted against itself becoming a fully onchain and permissionless protocol (Prop 692) and instead operates as a 2/6 multi-sig with a Discord-based voting system that the multi-sig signers can ignore or change the rules of on the fly, which happened with Prop 962 when their system posted a For vote, but the multi-sig signers decided to change it to an Abstain
> > >
> > > after the $nouns debacle, the decision to vote against becoming fully onchain and permissionless was the primary contributor for our shared delegate choosing to stop participating at Nouns or with Nouncil
> > >
> > > this version of Nouncil - less than 10 people on a weekly discord call with another 10-15 people in the voting body who don't join the calls - is a long ways away from the meritocratic mini-democracy our delegator once sought to empower, and has morphed into a version that drives away thoughtful, good-faith participants
> >
> > +1
> >
> > > 🤌