0x289715ff…c84fsent to0xf790a5f5…1365·#22,226,849·view on Etherscan
@0xA868...9E63
i hear you. tried to make this prop highlight a big problem we see and outline a way we're going to explore fixing it.
ultimately we're still going to be building every day to improve the core protocol, just like we've been doing. probably could have been less specific, but hope that makes sense
>
>
> This might be unfair to rocketman and team as its more of a meta-gripe but I wish this proposal was more like:
> "We did this, this and that, accomplishing impactful thing x and growing primary metric y. We want to continue to build the best way for Nouns to do z and asking for $x to last us another 6 months."
>
> I get the feeling good teams that "should" be renewed shoot themselves in the foot by being too flowery and unintentionally end up obfuscating the info that actually matter.
>
> Its easier for me to vote For giving Flows team 6 months of runway based on past achievements than it is to "approve" everything in this prop.
>