0xae65e700…46c0sent to0xb6d1eb1a…dab3·#19,371,494·view on Etherscan
(noun40 voting via agora)
I think we're splitting hairs here a bit. mandated prop house round have historically been super high ROI in terms of eth spent vs the quality of teams we get to being involved in our nouns world. but we've had a hard time doing more of them b/c in reality what's much rarer than the eth spent on mandated rounds is the consensus idea for which to run a round and attract outside attention in the first place. it's opportunities like nouns x faracaster that's rare. not $150k or $300k. ofc that doesn't mean that we should spend recklessly at any amount but i think any top 3 team that's seriously going to commit building out a nouns farcaster client likely has a opportunity cost higher than $100k. we're just making it a little easier financially and demonstrating with a bit more commitment that we really care about this. we put out the bat signal with a $150k commitment and if seneca is telling us that the signals on the ground is strong enough that we should just make it $300k and double down then i feel like it's a no brainer. again what's rare imo is schelling points like this rather than eth. nouns progress has never been limited by our treasury eth and always been limited by consensus fuck yeah directions to push and fund. farcaster is a clear one of those imo and we should push hard to explore what's possible.