0xb875badb…3309sent to0x6f3e6272…223d·#25,476,124·view on Etherscan
when we label firing someone as "mistreating" them, we are no longer trying to govern, we are playing politics. politics ruins daos; good governance saves them.
to date, no one has provided a logical argument for keeping the reserve duna admin. Stripymofo makes a valid point that giving them lead time to transition and find other income sources is a fairer approach, and i agree with that compromise.
however, we need to look at the explicit reality of the role as defined in our bylaws under section (b):
it is strictly an alternate role....subsection (i) states the reserve serves "during periods that the compliance administrator is unavailable." if the main admin is available, the reserve has no daily operational duties.
it is reactive, not proactive....subsection (ii) notes the reserve advises "upon a compliance administrator’s request." they are a "just in case" resource, not a co-admin.
this is not a full time or even part time operational job, it is an on call backup position. keeping someone on a retainer for an active role that the bylaws explicitly state shouldn't exist is bad governance.
next year's elections must reflect this reality. if a main admin candidate feels uncomfortable handling the role solo, they should not apply. moving forward, we should look into hiring a 3rd party company to handle this function so the dao can view these operations objectively, rather than personally.