0xcb06bede…b9ccsent to0x6f3e6272…223d·#19,539,907·view on Etherscan
My understanding is that Nouns Cares aims to bring aesthetics to existing substance within Nouns (proposals), which I do find intriguing as how imwylin says - not everyone is a marketer. Especially many technical builders who build amazing things. There’s definitely something there.
But seemingly fitting, while the aesthetics are there in this proposal, it’s really quite hard to get to the substance. Respectfully, it’s painfully GPT-esquely written, which drags throughout most of the prop.
I believe, but am not sure, the tl;dr is - “We help approved props which have substance, by providing aesthetics & marketing guidance” (free of charge to the individual proposers?)
I don’t think quarterly white papers “focusing on the latest trends, insights and strategies within the Web3 space” are of value or something that should be funded by Nouns. Key Performance Indicators are mentioned but none set for this very prop. Big brands like Dolce & Gabbana, Stake (the gambling site?), Amazon and the NBA are name dropped here, where the potential relation to Nouns is unclear, and even if feasible might very well not be wanted (i.e. a gambling site).
Again, there’s definitely something here, but I’m not confident in how highly technical builders who would theoretically benefit most from this, would actually be onboarded or be helped by this specifically. Further, it just doesn’t seem like the right culture fit.