0x289715ff…c84fsent to0xf790a5f5…1365·#22,420,593·view on Etherscan
flows---development-ask-(final)@0x073f...2e63
We built a completely new protocol and frontend from scratch. Happy to walk you through all the changes that were necessary to bring a production version to Nouns. You can check out the repos here:
https://github.com/cobuildwithus/flows-protocol
https://github.com/cobuildwithus/flows.wtf
Updated the site with a footer to make these more visible.
>
>
> What is the difference between the Flows on https://vrbs.wtf/ which was deployed almost a year ago and the Flows at https://flows.wtf/ besides UI/UX? Feels like we got a reskin that token gates using TCR.
>
> Also the proposal says that it's open source, can you please provide where the code is, because when I clicked the link in proposal 697 its giving me a 404: https://github.com/wkocjan/nouns-flows
>
> Then I search GitHub for nouns-flows and I see this https://github.com/obvious-inc/nouns-flows/ which has code, but the GitHub has not been updated in 6 months.
>
> +1
>
> > @0x073f...2e63
> >
> > We are proposing a complete revamp of the Flows protocol and platform which will take months. How do you propose we build that without being paid? We already cut our salaries 20%, and they're already well below market rate. I'd love to request more funds to pay builders, but the DAO has voted against us twice now to do that (as did you).
> >
> > Our last 2 props to fund existing Flows builders did not pass. I'm upset about that, but the reality is the breakeven movement does not want to fund existing Flows.
> >
> > It's clear we must chart a new path and show that Flows can generate revenue before we fund more public goods.
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > This just feels bad, it shouldn’t cost the DAO $90k to distribute $15k…. I’m surprised the numbers are not flipped around, feels like a bit of a gut punch to the 200+ builders who’ve built out their projects on Flows.
> > >