0x1aa55a5f…bdacsent to0xf790a5f5…1365·#22,919,938·view on Etherscan
@0xae47...5Fed
Thanks for the lecture on ad hominem, right before you rolled out a string of personal digs without engaging with the actual mechanics of the prop.
Of course you would say this makes me look worse. But I’m simply switching your position from discretionary to accountable adding a sort of stream based on your results, all while protecting the work we are doing and will continue to do.
- The problem is that you are feeling legitimated to steal these nogs basing it on the fact that we could “simply” buy them back. Completely disregarding the damage this would do to the current developments. You’re saying the DAO doesn’t want the NOGS anymore? It can burn them or distribute to someone who really cares to expand nogs, why should they all go to you? Because you scribbled out some discretionary bullet points? That’s literally what my proposal says. And that’s why the 1 eth. You can start working towards your goal without damaging us.
- As for sponsoring other people’s props. Our 3 owned nouns are currently in the same pool of the other nouns and we simply have used them to sponsor our props related to NNS. We’d be more than happy to sponsor other props, and have never denied it, it just hasn’t happened yet. Anyway, nogs holders will soon be able to do so by themselves using our pool. But hey, given your love for conspiracies, feel free to create whatever narratives suits you best.
- Unfortunately I can’t make the call tomorrow, but even I could, I just said that I refuse to do it with you as interviewer while you are running that insane prop. Almost everyone heard me talking on Spaces about our props and we even talked to each other. Stop lying, it’s exhausting and honestly it’s getting old. I’m not an exceptional English speaker and that is why I’ve always preferred writing, as it allows me to express myself better and avoid miscommunication. Want to use this as more bullying material? Go on.
- I am perfectly aware of slippage and I just checked the swap, you are right. Well, you’re only trying to steal +15eth then, guess it’s all good.
I honestly feel that this prop is not so much an attack as an opportunity for everyone. But we’re a democracy, so the majority will vote and decide.
Cheers.
>
>
> An ad hominem attack is a rhetorical strategy where someone responds to an argument by targeting the person making it, rather than addressing the argument itself. This approach is considered a logical fallacy because it diverts attention from the actual issue and focuses on irrelevant personal characteristics.
>
> - Could every single person in the ecosystem I've reached out to vote on lil noc please stand up? That may be your style, but it is not mine. I've not sent a single Noun owner a DM about this proposal + I have no pawns.
>
> - I'm not sure what is absurd about not wanting to promote NNS after you rugged everyone? You were happy to sell 100s of eth worth of nogs but 15e worth will destroy you? Makes zero sense, you could literally buy it back for 10e.
>
> - If I am a toxic bully, why do you want to send me 1eth? If you had ever attended a Lil Nouns call over the past 2 years, the community would probably tell you something quite different to what you have written here.
>
> - This is the 4th prop nogs.eth has ever sponsored, and all 4 have been self serving. People are able to read between the lines, actions speak louder than words.
>
> - The X spaces interview was/is not "my game", it was suggested to me last week live on X and I agreed to it. If you have nothing to hide then it would obviously be great to openly discuss things, as nobody has ever heard you speak.
>
> - Not sure if you are aware of slippage but since you removed 148e from the LP, there is now more price impact when selling, so the swap amount is 15e not 20+:
>
> [](https://zora.co/coin/base:0xa4cea7370e5f9e746782ad1d2fd7130dd195470f?referrer=0xae4705dc0816ee6d8a13f1c72780ec5021915fed)
>
> This proposal is not an improvement, and it actually makes you look even worse imo. What you did, and continue to do, with the NNS project is not cool - it is totally self serving and a middle finger to the Nouns community.
>
> Hope everyone has a good week.
>
> ⌐◨-◨
>