memoscan
← all memos

Memo 0x4d6140e8…e5903a on Ethereum

why? this makes no sense at all honestly... No shade, but shouldn't you be focused on the X.com posts? Or drop an update on why you stopped? With no 'real' commitment to anything, all these props, 'visions statements', X delegation, etc, just feel performative. +1 > @0x8aB0...ad1C > > My thinking was that a zero-treasury-cost model lowers the barrier to experimenting with partnerships and opens the door for the community to collaborate with other ecosystems without relying on grants. > > > > > > > I don’t think Nouns is ready for this right now. > > > > We need to get the house in order before bringing more partners into the mix. Too many opportunities have come through the DAO with real potential, but without the leadership, structure, execution, and follow-through needed to make them work. > > > > That ends up wasting the partner’s time, the DAO’s attention, and the community’s energy. > > > > Before we push more partnerships forward, we need a clear system for how opportunities are evaluated, who manages them, who owns execution, how contributors are activated, and what success looks like. > > > > Nouns has everything we need to be great, now it needs the organization to support it. > > +1 > @0xf84a...b5A8 > > Appreciate the thoughtful comment. The goal wasn't permission to use the Nouns brand,it was to create an on-chain, transparent commitment rather than simply claiming a partnership off-chain. I could have explained that much better. > > > How to become a Nouns Ecosystem Partner? > > Buy a Noun at auction. > > > > no proposal needed for: > > 1) token allocation. trustless by nature > > 2) public recognition of Nouns across your touchpoints. baked into the brand assets being CC0. Nouns is free ⌐◨-◨ > > > > If at all, some more details around the following would be nice, but fundamentally not required. > > - what "Nouns participating as one of our ecosystem and go-to-market partners." is supposed to entail and do. What is the actual "participation"? > > - if there is no transactional value exchange, what is the difference going to be in the "governance proposal"? > > > > The DAO doesn't need to recognize Nudge as anything specific and there is no benefit to be realized for a proposal with no actual transaction. > > > > If they want to be affiliated to the DAO and have proof for that, there are 2 options: > > 1) buy a Noun from the daily auction > > 2) buy a Noun on secondary market > > > > #1 is highly recommended for a fresh start, given the context of the players of this proposal. > > > > Apart from that, Nudge seems to be dormant all over: > > - last tweet on Aug 09, 2025 > > - last upload to youtube a year ago > > - last telegram message on March 03, 2025 > > - last post released on behiive on May 29, 2025 > > > > With this context, it's not clear how two sleepy and tired partners are going to cross-polinate at all. > > > > Everyone is napping. > > ⌐◨-◨